(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
11 messages
Updated 11/6/2023 3:02:24 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,158 messages
Updated 12/17/2024 8:41:38 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Tuscaloosa Specific)
6 messages
Updated 6/30/2008 7:08:16 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
Subject: |
How massive was Trump's win?
|
Date:
|
12/14/2024 9:00:55 AM
|
It was pretty dang massive when you look into the numbers. From ZeroHedge:
Trump’s victory came despite finishing behind Harris by over four million votes in California and New York combined and despite these states combining for 84 electoral votes. Dismissing the result in these two states, Trump won by five percentage points in the other 48 states and 312 to 142 in electoral votes. Take away the results of Massachusetts and Washington, and Trump won by almost seven percentage points in the popular vote and 312-121 in the electoral vote.
Basically, apart from the coasts, Trump won overwhelmingly: where 80 percent of the presidential electoral votes are, Trump won three-quarters of them.
All ths despite being wildly outspent (an understatement for sure), 90%+ negative media coverage, fawning coverage of Harris and giving her a pass for the lack of interviews, all the lawfare, two assassination attempts, being opposed by pretty much every elite organization in the country and censorship by Fakebook, TikTok, Google, etc.
|
Name: |
Shortbus
-
|
|
Subject: |
How massive was Trump's win?
|
Date:
|
12/14/2024 10:35:08 AM
|
Well before game changing cheating, this is what Trump would look like.
https://www.270towin.com/1972_Election/
|
Name: |
MrHodja
-
|
|
Subject: |
How massive was Trump's win?
|
Date:
|
12/14/2024 3:50:21 PM (updated 12/14/2024 3:51:26 PM)
|
And all the tech CEOs are lining up to give Trump support and money for his inauguration, sadly not because they "see the light" but because it makes good business sense to do so. They aren't lining up to pay off Harris' overspending because she lost and is in no place to help them. Nothing has changed in the way politics works except the number of zeroes in the checks they write to the winner. Hypocrisy rules.
I did watch a short bit of video from the Army Navy game where Trump, Vance, Johnson and Thune were engaged in a lengthy conversation, at times seemingly deep into discussion, at other times laughing. Even though we don't know what they said, it is good to see they easily engage in such joint conversations.
|
|
|