Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/14/2019 9:29:39 PM (updated 1/14/2019 9:31:31 PM)

Do any of you, as mostly Trump supporters and patriotic Americans, have even the least unease that the Russian Prime Minister and Defense and foreign ministers and other high up in the Kremlin know what transpired at the 1 on 1 meeting in Helsinki between Putin and Trump, but the US Secty's of State and Defense along with the Director of National Intellegence, National Security Advisor and Vice President do not? Serious answers only please...this means no comment needed from Wix for sure and probably Lifer and Phil!.

Name:	MrHodja -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/14/2019 11:56:09 PM

Arch, do you ask loaded questions on purpose or do you not know what one is?  Your question assumes what you state is fact but I am not so sure it is, so I would not give you a yes or no answer.

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 1:01:15 AM

Since I was not disinvited I will respond to your question. It's only because a "hot" microphone was picked up that we know that President Obama leaned over to Russian President Mededev during their meeting in Korea advising him to tell Putin that he would have more "flexibility" on all issues, but particularly on the delicate issue of "missie defense", after the November election. Do you think that all the "powers at be" that you mentioned would have known a word about Obama's advice to Putin had it not been for the "open" microphone? It just so happens that at that time Republican presidential candidate Romney seized on Obama's unintended comment, calling it "alarming and troubling". You see, you only like to tell "one" side of the story.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  You wouldn't be satisfied even if President Trump made a "taped recording" of his every word and sent to to the New York Times for publication and "your" fake news review.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	I like thread crashing
Date:	1/15/2019 7:59:16 AM

Your serious question assumes "facts"" that you know nothing about other than what you heard on MSNBC and CNN. But since I was excluded from your "serious" question I will just say you are you're an idiot who now suffers from TDS to the point of being out of touch with reality.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 8:45:32 AM

Serious question for you - How many of Clinton, Bush or Obama's one on one meetings do we have complete transcripts for.  It has been reported that the NSC knows what was said in the meetings - is that not enough?  Oh, right you and the left wing media know better then national security committee.

Sorry but as more and more of your "Russia Russia Russia" BS is exposed as the coup by the DNC/Hillary/Obama - Sorry you are unable to see past your "middle of the road" to see that it was all created to allow Hillary to attempt to overturn the election in court.  Steele himself testified to that in a EU court.

British ex-spy Christopher Steele, who wrote the Democrat-financed anti-Trump dossier, said in a court case that he was hired by a Democratic law firm in preparation for Hillary Clinton challenging the results of the 2016 presidential election.

He said the law firm Perkins Coie wanted to be in a position to contest the results based on evidence he unearthed on the Trump campaign conspiring with Moscow on election interference.

His scenario is contained in a sealed Aug. 2 declaration in a defamation law suit brought by three Russian bankers in London. The trio’s American attorneys filed his answers Tuesday in a libel lawsuit in Washington against the investigative firm Fusion GPS, which handled the former British intelligence officer.

Name:	Carlson -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 8:50:09 AM

Presidents have had one on one on one discussions with world leaders since the beginning of time.  During these times where when Mr. Trump goes to the bathroom is reported as fact even though we are not told if it was #1 or #2, why would he have others in the room with Mr. Putin.  Actually I find it genius that he did it.  I’m reminded of the song, ” let’s give them something to talk about”. 

This Russian thing has gotten wildly out of control!  

So Archy, does it not bother you that the FBI can open a formal investigation based on hearsay?  Now that’s scary!  

Name:	CRD -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 10:11:56 AM

Can we subpoena Hillary's translators/staff notes too Archie for that 100 Mill "donated" to the Clinton Foundation for no reason other than pure humanitarian generosity?

Name:	lucky67 -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 2:50:06 PM (updated 1/15/2019 2:51:56 PM)

doesnt Bob Woodruff have the meeting notes ? and more importantly--why is it necessary for you to have the substance of presidential meetings--maybe when we decide to bomb a terrorist, you need to know that in advance also ?

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	ARCH-supreme-krap-IDIOT
Date:	1/15/2019 5:13:29 PM

OMG, arch-idiot paid me a wonderful complement by demanding that I not respond to his stupid post.  Thank you, idiot.  Looks like you have been adequately slammed against the wall, by many, so I’ll just wait for the next opportunity.....

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 8:23:16 PM

Phil I of course have NO transcript of any meeting of any president.  But, whatever previous president you refer to, you can be sure that president's Secy's of State and Defense, Dir of Intellegence and National Security Advisor did!

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 8:30:15 PM

I would be concerned if in fact the post J. Edgar Hoover FBI opened an investigation on hearsay.  But, they don't.  Where is you verifiable evidence they do? Just because Trump, Limbaugh, Counter or any member of this forum says they do does not make it true.

If there is factual evidence to back up what someone with a bias might see as ''hearsay'' it is not hearsay. 

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 8:38:25 PM (updated 1/15/2019 8:42:04 PM)

Even when you , as typical, divert and change the subject to avoid an answer you still post an instructive reply.  Do you see the woman in the background?  Why do you think she is there?  There was a similar person in with Trump and Putin but Dear Leader confiscated his or her notes and warned him or her not to discuss what was said.  Putin's counterpart did not receive such treatment so we can now assume the GRU knows what was said but the CIA does not.

Another question, when did Republicans start trusting the Russian government more than our own?  Jan 20, 2017 maybe?

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	I don't
Date:	1/15/2019 8:39:33 PM (updated 1/15/2019 8:40:44 PM)

The State Dept does!

Who is Bob Woodruff?

Name:	CRD -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 10:20:42 PM

Archie,

You are for once correct...I did change the subject, from DJT to Hillary, whose pay to play schemes you seemed to be ok with.  Was that discussed there?  Perhaps it was and Hillary asked that the conversation not be transcribed.  How do we know?   If I remember correctly, one of DJT's first private conversation with a world leader was LEAKED!   He can't trust anyone.  No world leader can feel confident that he/she can have a private conversation with the leader of the free world with the degree of leaking by his enemies in this administration.  I don't blame him one bit and I challenge you to say any differently if your private conversations with clients, contractors etc were being leaked and disseminated to the advantage of your competitors. Common sense Archie, just plain and simple common sense.

Name:	CRD -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/15/2019 10:22:39 PM

And your source was the Washington Post?  Be serious.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Serious question
Date:	1/16/2019 8:49:51 AM

And a member of the NSC said they knew what was said.  Again I ask - do you have any concerns with your "Russia Russia Russia" coup that has been brought about by the DNC / Hillary / Obama and spying opening a investigation without a crime, without evidence but on the "concern" that he may be a spy willingly or unwittingly.  You really do make us laugh.

Sorry but this Russia BS is making Watergate look like nothing - and you seem to not be concerned at all.  Well that makes sense, as it was your King Obama and Queen Hillary with their checkbooks all over Fusion GPS/Steele.