| Name: |
MartiniMan
- 
|
|
| Subject: |
Extremist left control of Democrat party
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 8:45:57 AM
|
Yet another example that extreme leftist groups control the Democrat party are all the ancillary, special interest amendments Dems are piling into the already bloated immigration bill. Of course we all know the reason for this anyway. They believe the bill will pass the Senate and then die in the House, thereby giving TOTUS ammunition to pillory Republicans and hopefully retake the House in 2014 so he can finish destroying the country in his last two years. Sadly, it will probably work on the former strategy and the jury is still out on what will happen in 2014.
For sure if you look at how Sanford nationalized the special election and tied his opponent to Obama, Reid and Pelosi, that may represent the template for 2014. Does America really want Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of House again? She is one of the most well known and most disliked members of Congress......of course she is the lackey of extremist left wing zealots so its no wonder she is so unpopular.......except with the extremist, left wing zealots, anyway.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Explanation of the preceding post
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 11:10:06 AM
|
The post above was intended to be a sarcastic play off the left wing nuts frequently advising the GOP about what they need to do to win elections. Because they usually attribute all losses by GOP candidates being a result of the inordinate influence of so-called extremist far right wing groups I was merely sarcastically playing the same tune but ascribing the loss to the so-called influence of extremist far left groups on the losing candidate. I apologize for any misunderstanding and in the future will be much clearer with my posts. Perhaps I will start with <sarcasm on> and <sarcasm off> for those that do not get the intent of my post.
|
| Name: |
MrHodja
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Explanation of the preceding post
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 12:42:18 PM
|
As they say in military comms, I copied you 5 by 5.
|
| Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Explanation of the preceding post
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 12:49:36 PM
|
Are you suggesting that you need to dumb down your posts so your followers can understand them?????Archie and i have no problem understanding your ridiculous posts such as justifying Sanford cause of the Dem moral scumbags you listed. I am surprised you do not support abortion since abortion reduces welfare. Or, support use of condoms since they reduce abortions.
Really sad that the Right supported him in the primary.
Next stop for Sanford is a court date. How can you justify a scumbag of any party for any office? I thought you traveled the high road.
Better to sit out an election than vote for a scumbag.
|
| Name: |
wix
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Goofball
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 1:37:00 PM
|
Why did Sanford's ex-wife wait until the middle of the election to claim he violated the divorce. Aren't these civil proceedings?
|
| Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Goofball Responds to Princess Wix
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 2:35:25 PM
|
A Lib looks up the answer...a Nut on the Right has to ask the question......Look it up Princess
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Hey Wixie Poo
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 3:06:39 PM (updated 5/8/2013 3:10:56 PM)
|
She filed the civil complaint immediately after the event occurred. It became public when the court hearing's calendar was published in the normal manner. If you think Sanford's ex was part of a conspiracy, I'll bet you even think, along with one of your GOP/T-party cohorts in NH, that the Boston bombing was planned and carried out by Obama!!
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Oh my...Colbert Busch had been busted in 88
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 3:51:19 PM (updated 5/8/2013 4:01:40 PM)
|
LOL! She was indeed a perfect example of the Dem party. No wonder she wouldn't debate Sanford (other than the fact that she didn't even know what the subject of the Manchin-Toomey legislation was about....hint...bang, bang). Gotta love that it involved a messy divorce. I told you left wing nuts not to throw stones.....my, my...how ironic. [Note to Archie: I say ironic because of the big deal made about Sanford's actions vis-a-vis his wife and their divorce. It is ironic because your candidate apparently had exactly the same issues except she actually got arrested. Do I need to define irony for you or does this explanation work?]
|
| Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Oh my...Colbert Busch had been busted in 88
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 4:56:52 PM
|
So, here we go again.........justify your scumbag cause a Dem was arrested. I thought you stood for higher morals.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Not at all....but you have to admit it is funny
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 5:01:28 PM
|
Y'all picked the perfect candidate for him to run against him........not...... If it were the other way around I would have slapped my forehead and groaned at our malfeasance in picking her. Turns out the voters had no other choice but to pick Sanford since she is no better on the morals front, was involved in a messy divorce and got busted and is wrong on all the issues and is clueless about even current legislation and outspent him 5 to 1 with elitist money and was lousy at retail politics.
C'mon GF, ya gotta admit it is pretty funny.......she had no hope in such a GOP controlled district anyway.
|
| Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Not at all....but you have to admit it is funny
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 5:17:12 PM
|
"she had no hope in such a GOP controlled district anyway." That I will agree with you. It is the Right that voted for him in the primary that shocks me. And yes it is funny....but then I find all your posts laughable.
Cheers
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
I agree on the primary
|
|
Date:
|
5/8/2013 7:12:14 PM
|
I would not have voted for him.
|
|
New Post
Search
Off-Topic Forum
Reply
»
Utah Lakes
»
Scofield Reservoir
Login
|
Home
