Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/20/2016 3:27:44 PM

1.  Hillary refused to refute her "pay to play" question, but went on to talk about all the "great" things about the Clinton Foundation.

2.  She basically told everyone about our nuclear response time and talked about Syria.  I'm sure the military was none to happy, because one key battle planning essential is surprise.

3.  Her long range goal is to open all of our borders.  I wonder if she read the article in the Washington Post aobut Europe now wanting to send the immigrants that they took in back to their native countries. 

4.  When Trump said she was a "nasty woman" he was right - her comment was a low blow.  She complains about his nastiness, but she is equally nasty.

5.  I was disappointed that they didn't question her about having the Equador Embassy turn off the computer access of the WikiLeaks founder, presumably to stench the flow of emails Hillary doesn't want you to know about. 

Now let Architect or Copperline or Gone Fishing come spew all over my comments.  Any one have anything to add from your observations?

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/20/2016 4:01:40 PM

https://www.thelocal.de/20160225/afghan-migrants-voluntarily-head-home-from-germany

Germany is trying to induce more migrants to return home by paying their travel fees and in some circumstances giving them start-up cash for when they get back.

http://connection.ebscohost.com/world/border-walls/history-border-walls-us-and-around-world

In 1996, President Bill Clinton signed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. The act increased fines for illegal aliens, provided additional funding for border patrol and surveillance, and also approved the installation of an additional 14-mile (22-kilometer) fence near San Diego. Some landowners in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas erected their own fences, often with the help of militia, but no permanent barrier had been constructed by the government in these areas until recently.

The Secure Fence Act, signed by President George W. Bush in 2006, promised 700 miles (1,126 kilometers) of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border; however, lawsuits and protests from citizen groups halted construction.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/20/2016 4:27:27 PM

Hillary is a smug condescending liar. Pathologically so. It rarely gets mention that right out of college she worked on the impeachment committee of Nixon and was FIRED FOR LYING.

What sticks in my craw about these "refugees"  is looking at the videos and pictures you don't see what has historically been refugees which is elderly, women and children. The vast majority of what you see flooding out of the middle east is MILITARY AGED MALES. This is an infiltration, not a refugee crisis. Any military aged males should be sent back to their homeland to fight or die!  But no,  we greet them with pamphlets in their native language with instructions on how to get government handouts. The $1500 initial payment is probably more money than they have seen in a lifetime.

Instead troops we should send the Red Cross to set up camps in their homeland with enough security to keep them safe from outsiders. If they won't to rape, pillage and plunder within the camps then so be it. Like I said lots of young guys I see in these lines that should be protecting themselves and their families, or die for all I care.  They are savages for the most part. No calling Muslim men savages is not racist.  Muslim is not a race.  BIGOTED? You bet. I have an ingrained inclination to not like or want to associate with men who think women are property. Does that make me a feminist? Not by today's standard apparently. The only time I consider myself female when I need to use the rest room at Target.

One other thing from last night when she claimed 90% of family crime money went to recipients when in fact 95%+ goes to salaries and exorbitant travel.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/20/2016 4:27:42 PM

In regards to #5 - to think if it was the US Gov/ Hillary campaign/generals/NSA/FBI etc - funny part is that if correct they think that cutting him off was going to stop the flow of emails - i am sure he is not sitting in the embassy posting it all solo from a server in his bathroom in the embassy.

Probably closer to the truth would be to cut him off from doing a play by play on the drone strike / men in black storming the compound. Or possibly to cut him off from calling forth a full data dump, which as a smart person would the data is already out  as a form of insurance from sudden involuntary suicides.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Lol.... I love that
Date:	10/20/2016 4:39:02 PM

Sudden in oluntary suicide

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Notes and More Notes
Date:	10/20/2016 7:03:18 PM

I have no reason to debate your notes. You will vote for Trump and I will vote for Clinton. The rest is semantics...neither will convince te other.

I did note Trump's refusal to accept the outcome was not important enough to deserve an entry in your notes.....

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	Notes and More Notes
Date:	10/20/2016 7:41:11 PM

If I could cut and paste here I would show the 8 times that dims have contested elections since 2000.yoj can find the story o  drudgereport if it interests you,  but I doubt it does.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	For My Good Ole Buddy
Date:	10/20/2016 8:17:48 PM

To be fair and balanced.....

FYI

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	For My Good Ole Buddy
Date:	10/20/2016 9:09:31 PM

I didn't think anything about Trump saying that.  He'd hardly be the first to ask for a recount.  He like to keep Democrats on edge too, because they believe he will start an insurrection in the population if he is not elected.  After all the stuff that has come out about Hilary, the emails and the videos, I'm not so sure this election isn't rigged, and voter intimidation or fraud will have nothing to do with it. 

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/20/2016 10:46:07 PM (updated 10/20/2016 11:00:36 PM)

Rightly or wrongly, for better or worse Hillary did exactly what a good debater does.  Donald did not!  How can he claim to be a such a masterful ''negotiator'' when is such an abject failure at debate?

What did you think of your hero's performance...accepting the election results, good or bad...calling Hillary a ''nasty person''...good or bad, saying falsly that the sexual charges against him had been debunked, good or bad...,making it obviously clear he believed Putin over America's intellegence community, good or bad...his ''closing'' statement vs her's, good or bad?

I'm sure you thought he did fine...most of your fellow citizens did not.

Now, give us your assessment of your hero's ''performance'' at the Al Smith Dinner tonight where instead of telling jokes he delivers a personal attack and is roundly booed by the audiance?

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/21/2016 12:31:26 AM

I guess Hillary didn't tell any jokes or cast any stones at Donald.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/21/2016 8:59:42 AM (updated 10/21/2016 9:04:39 AM)

Listen with an open mind...Her's were barbed but occasionally funny...His were occasionally funny but most were hateful and personal.

Her's were often directed at her...His, except for the first, were aimed at others...mostly Hillary.

Her's were well received by the guests at the platform tables...his, as evidenced by the look on the faces behind him, were an embarassment.  One wondered whether the Cardinal or master of ceremony might stand up and stop his presentation. 

Her's sounded like the typical ''roast'' commentary...his WAS a political campaign speech.

Her's brought an occasional laugh and a few groans...his brought an occasional laugh and often loud boos and catcalls....something that veteran attendees of the charity dinner said they had never witnessed before.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	My Notes from last night
Date:	10/21/2016 11:27:27 AM

Rightly or wrongly, for better or worse Hillary did exactly what a good debater does.  Donald did not!  How can he claim to be a such a masterful ''negotiator'' when is such an abject failure at debate?

What did you think of your hero's performance...accepting the election results, good or bad...calling Hillary a ''nasty person''...good or bad, saying falsly that the sexual charges against him had been debunked, good or bad...,making it obviously clear he believed Putin over America's intellegence community, good or bad...his ''closing'' statement vs her's, good or bad?

I'm sure you thought he did fine...most of your fellow citizens did not.

Now, give us your assessment of your hero's ''performance'' at the Al Smith Dinner tonight where instead of telling jokes he delivers a personal attack and is roundly booed by the audiance?

Personally I think Trump is a mess, I do not care for him as a human being.  I thought his attacks were crappy at best, and with such wonderful things that he could have attacked her on well sloppy and unprepared.  

Hillary is well spoken and honed through years of public speaking, corruption, lying and coverups.  Unfornuatly she is just a nasty hombre.  Sorry I will take sloppy over evil any day.

Is she nasty - Yes

sexual charges  - Debunked or not - well its just sex, or at least that is what Bill Clinton said.  Till a lawsuit and a guilty verdict stick it in your ear.  Oh but its actually sexual assualt to grab someone and Mrs leads alleges he was an octopus just all over her.  

and we know that Bill is not running for office - just his dear snowdrift wife.  but latest person claiming to be raped by Bill.

She also says that Clinton signed his name to a page on her reporter’s notebook that had her own name on it, writing “Clinton” directly above her name.

“And I said, ‘What are you doing? Giving me an autograph now?’ And he said, ‘No, I just wanted to show you how good Clinton looks on top of Leslie.’”

Such sweet words - but just words and maybe some unwanted grafitti on her notebook - but wow just words

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/19/exclusive-video-interview-new-bill-clinton-sexual-assault-accuser-goes-public-first-time/

“…he followed me into an editing room. The first time I remember. That it was very small. There was a chair. I was sitting in a chair. He came up behind me and started rubbing my shoulders and running his hands down toward my breasts. And I was just stunned. I froze. I asked him to stop. He laughed.

“That happened on three occasions. And each time it escalated where the aggressive nature of his touch and what he was doing behind me escalated.”

“And he came in behind me. Started hunching me to the point that he had an orgasm. He’s trying to touch my breasts. And I’m just sitting there very stiffly, just waiting for him to leave me alone. And I’m asking him the whole time, ‘Please do not do this. Do not touch me. Do not hunch me. I do not want this.’

“And he finished doing what he was doing and he walked out.”

Wow I have seen dogs with better manners - but he is not going to be president - just back in the White House.  Maybe Hillary can build him a little dog house out back and put a leash around - well its not his neck that she needs to control.

Beliving Putin over America's intellegence community - well truth to be told I would probably as well.  I have come to distrust the majority of our government, or fear their knock on my door.  The IRS is being used as a punisment tool by the White House, the DOJ and FBI after they looked at the email issues look like a joke with collusion and tarnishing the reputation of both departments.  

I find it funny that Washington loves its reports and whitepapers that explain opinions and lots of things - has anyone actually seen a report showing anything to actually point to anyone?  So we are just supposed to take their word for it?  Wow they are just so trustworthy that they would never lie for a political reason.  Anyone remember the person jailed for his youtube video over Benhazi?  Everyone from the Whitehouse and State department was publically 100% able to point to that person as the reason why people died, we now know that they lied.

And besides at this point what does it even matter if Russia did the hacking - its not like they hacked our ballot boxes cause we all know that there is no voter fraud.... well except them damn Russians. Dead people dont vote - except in Alabamastan.  No one ever votes who is not an American citizen.  The levels of fraud just does not come up to the point that it could actually sway an election, I believe that about as well as Hillary did not tell someone to destory emails after being ordered not to and to produce records, or the IRS not remembering they had an order as well but destroyed hard drives and tapes after the fact.  Just honest every day hard working follks just like Arch and GF.

You want to talk about how wonderful intelligence information is, yet you want to say that Bush/Tony Blair falsified intelligence to go to war.  Intelligence agencies have never been manipulated or contridicted,  ever as they are obviously as unbiased as our news media.  Anyone with much computer knowledge knows that to hide your tracks you go through other systems to make it harder for people to find you.  Hell if it was that easy to track down and prosecute people for computer crimes - then why do so many that occur inside the US by people inside the US not get prosecuted?

And congress does not watch porn.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/17/oops-virginia-congressional-candidate-leaves-porn-tabs-open-on-facebook-post.html

"Curious by nature, I wanted to test the suggestion that somehow, lurking out in the pornographic world there is some evil operator waiting for the one in a gazillion chance that a candidate for federal office would go to that particular website and thereby be infected with a virus that would cause his or her FEC data file to crash the FEC file application each time that it was loaded on the day of the filing deadline, as well as impact other critical campaign systems,” Webb wrote.

but he was just doing some "intrusion testing" by intentially hanging out in porno land trying to get infected to determine if someone could compromise ihs system.   AND yes he was a Republican who got caught.

but Trumpistan attacked a Muslim Gold star war parent

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/07/31/have-we-forgotten-that-hillary-pretty-much-called-a-gold-star-mother-a-liar-n2200420

And Hillary is a saint

Oh, so Smith is not only wrong—her grief may have induced some amnesia? Both statements from Trump and Clinton are pretty bad. They both said dumb things to the families of those who have served; Smith was in the Air Force prior to joining the U.S. Foreign Service. Can we at least agree on that?

but at the charity dinner Trump just attacked but Clintons was ok because it was light hearted and got some laughs?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/20/politics/al-smith-dinner-hillary-clinton-donald-tump/

woops how did that CNN link get in there.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	To My Buddy Philsie
Date:	10/21/2016 11:58:33 AM

"Just honest every day hard working follks just like Arch and GF." I am honored to be included in your  post. Thanks for thinking of me...remember, when we meet I wlll buy you a latte.

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	Architect
Date:	10/21/2016 1:33:17 PM (updated 10/21/2016 1:36:36 PM)

I thought Hilary took a cheap shot and that Trump is right - she is a nasty woman.  If it hadn't been on TV, he might have called her a B__ch.  Which is exactly what she is.  Face it, Hilary does not like strong men - and the proof of that is Tim Kaine as her running mate.  He's such an a>>kisser that he's using Preparation H for chap stick.  And he too likes to take cheap shots.  And I wonder what prol-choice Hillary was doing at a Catholic Charity dinner?  She wasn't preaching her pro-choice stance to that group.

BTW, I still have my pro-choice stance and always will, regardless of who is in the WH.  but then, I'm not giving speeches at Catholic dinners either.

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Architect
Date:	10/21/2016 2:34:11 PM

For years since I think the 20's it has been the tradition during presidential election years for both major party candidates to appear at the Al Smith Dinner regardless of their party or stance on any issue including abortion.  After Trump's disgusting refusal to continue the tradition of good hiumor and comity, one has to wonder whether the tradition will continue in 2020...especially if the nation and world have the misfortune to have this idiot in the White House!

Name:	rude evin -	Reply
Subject:	Architect
Date:	10/21/2016 5:33:31 PM

So the question for you Archy is.....should DT lose the pop vote but win in the E College will you accept DT with no reservations as the US Pres?? YOu answer then I will answer same question re the HIL...

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	To My Buddy Philsie
Date:	10/24/2016 10:31:01 AM

That would be sarcasm - and I would not drink a latte - ugh you might as well be french or something.

Keep your swill - i would prefer to not sit in the same place as you.