Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	The results are in
Date:	9/27/2016 6:58:16 AM

Clinton by a knock-out!  Rudy says Trump should skip the next debates because Lester was ''unfair'' to Trump!! How can any sane man say that?  OH, now I realize...he was PO'd that Lester refused to step in and stop Trump from hangung himself by his own words, interruptions and lack of knowledge with almost anything.  Maybe qa little preparation is needed for a debate after all...not a bad thing in a president either.

Name:	Lifer -	Reply
Subject:	The results are in
Date:	9/27/2016 8:47:55 AM

Only on the Clinton news network.  I just read that time,  CBS, NY times and a couple of other snap polls went to Trump. 

Name:	copperline -	Reply
Subject:	The results are in
Date:	9/27/2016 10:44:28 AM

I haven't seen polling that indicates that Trump won this debate... although some are giving him credit for what he said on international trade deals.   I thought even that part of his speech was garbled and it remains very unclear what he was talking about.

Asked what he would do to fulfill his statements that he would 'bring manufacturing back to the US from overseas'.... he instead answered that he would stop companies from leaving in the first place.   Good idea, Donald, but how about answering the question you were asked?  Perhaps the answer is that he has no answer, promising to bring manufacturing back was just something he decided to say because it sounded good to him.

He really has no ideas beyond his stock phrases & cliches.  He's a showman, not a thinker.

But last night, he didn't even prepare for the show.

We will see if he backs out of the future debates based on his poor showing last night.... if he does that, he will have to find a way to spin it to NOT look like he is hiding his weakness.   For Donald, that means blaming someone else.

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	Archidiot.....
Date:	9/27/2016 11:51:25 AM

Read some real reports:  http://heatst.com/politics/lester-holt-the-third-debater/

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	Yeah, yeah Wixie, keep shoveling
Date:	9/27/2016 12:22:56 PM

keep shoveling.

"When the facts are on your side, pound the facts. When the law is on your side, pound the law. When neither are on your side, pound the table"...Today Trump and his supporters are pounding the table big time!

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Hey Weasal Wix
Date:	9/27/2016 12:49:15 PM (updated 9/27/2016 1:14:37 PM)

Holt is a regisyered Republican. Now, why would he help Hillary?  You are sounding more and more like Genrl Hodj. You are full of excuses...you can do better dude.

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	Goo-krap*
Date:	9/27/2016 5:02:34 PM

Make that The Hilda B----H loving wing of the Establishment repub-thugs.  He did exactly what the dimokraps wanted him to do.  If Hilda wins he has been promised the WH Press (Lying) Secretary job.......he deserves it.

Name:	copperline -	Reply
Subject:	that's pure BS
Date:	9/27/2016 5:04:53 PM

You mean why didn't Lester Holt ask more questions about the Benghazi fiasco that has been investigated & found to be nothing by a Congressional subcommittee?   Or why he didn't ask questions about the email kerfuffle that has been investigated and cleared by the FBI?   Or the Clinton Foundation that has been evaluated & rated as an extremely effective and well run charity?

I don't know why Lester skipped over this stuff.  Maybe because it has been settled and done.

Unlike the Trump Foundation or Trump University.   Or Trump's financial connections overseas. Or what Trump plans to do his ownership of Trump Industries if he is elected.

Yeah, Holt skipped over some really important stuff.  Maybe next time......

Name:	architect -	Reply
Subject:	that's pure BS...Yep...keep shoveling Wixie
Date:	9/27/2016 6:42:44 PM

Keep shoveling!!

Name:	DS Realist -	Reply
Subject:	IT "Hillary Cover-up"
Date:	9/27/2016 7:53:01 PM

I did not watch much of the debate; what I did see was more of the same from both candidates.  I am not undecided which is why i did not watch it.

Hilda is smart.  If she owns up to an issue of using the server, she doesn't get prosecuted for the bigger issue of sending classified info over a non secure network.  But you can't have one (owning up to the server issue) without the other (sending out classified info).  So if there was no classified info on the server, then why is Hilda admitting to having used the server as a mistake..........

I saw her bogus discussion with regard to PRINTED CLASSIFIED info and how it has to be marked.  Again, this is printed info not emailed info.  If you discuss the contents of the printed info outside of a SCIF or send it via an email over an unsecure network, it is obviously NOT marked like printed info is.  She really does think that all people are as dumb as a rock.

1+1 just does not equal 2 here.

The FBI guy was clearly intimidated.

Now there is the IT Hillary Cover-up Operation from of all places CNN, the Clinton News Network.  Of course Mook says republicans leaked the info when in fact, the FBI released it last Friday.  http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/25/clinton-mook-fbi.cnn