Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 2:20:24 PM

interesting situation Sessions has gotten himself in.  If you watch the questioning of Sessions by the Franken idiot, you'll see Franken struggling to phrase his question in exactly the way he was coached as a means of entrapment of Sessions.  Until the Administraion can flush all the dimokrap slugs down the krapper these efforts to entrap Republicans will continue.  Flush, FLUSH!!

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 2:28:54 PM

No kidding - well Franken is/was a comedian and the joke is on the American people.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 5:26:04 PM

Then, why has Sessions decided to recuse himself from any probe related to 2016 presidential campaign? Because he is quilty????? Thanks to the comedian from MN. An innocent AG would never recuse himself.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 5:38:04 PM (updated 3/2/2017 5:39:19 PM)

Ok and your an idiot.  So he recused himself because he is guilty?  OMFG what are you smoking??  

He recused himself so that if anything is found it can go foward and not look like Bill Clinton and Lynch meeting at an airport.  Its called doing the right thing, something you and most dems will never understand.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 5:38:05 PM (updated 3/2/2017 5:39:05 PM)

Ok and your an idiot.  So he recused himself because he is guilty?  OMFG what are you smoking??  

He recused himself so that if anything is found it can go foward and not look like Bill Clinton and Lynch meeting at an airport.  Its called doing the right thing, something you and most dems will never understand.

Damn Post was so good it posted twice - lol

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions........Comedian Franken?
Date:	3/2/2017 5:53:28 PM

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/03/02/jeff-sessions-has-a-long-history-of-telling-democrats-to-recuse-themselves.html

Sessions portrayed recusal as standard practice when such conflicts arise, and urged her to act “in a way that’s consistent with the highest ethical standards of recusal.”

yup he recused himself as a matter of ethical standards - something dems know nothing about

In 2011, Sessions called for Justice Elena Kagan to recuse herself from case before the Supreme Court on a lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate. Kagan had defended the law as solicitor general in the Obama administration.

Kagan - nope no ethics

More recently, Sessions criticized his attorney general predecessor, Loretta Lynch for failing to recuse herself in the federal government’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s email practices.

Lynch - nope no ethics

Ginsberg / Kagan on gay marriage after public comments / performing a wedding

no ethics

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/10/jeff-sessions-to-recuse-from-hillary-clinton-clint/

He also recused hiself from a Hillary Clinton probe - guess hes guily of having an email server in his closet and hiding everything to keep it away from FOIA, deleting emails that were requested by congress.. Oh wait that was your looser of a canidate who could not win a rigged election....

Maybe he can just wipe it with a cloth.. Besides what difference does it make anyway !  LOL!!!!!

God whatever you are smoking must by some really good stuff to keep you this high all the time.   Pass the bong around!!!!!!!!!  We should all be so delusional.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Wix - Comedian GFY!
Date:	3/2/2017 5:55:06 PM (updated 3/2/2017 5:56:55 PM)

Hey wix - I figured it out - we have our own comedian  - GFY!!!! 

He makes Franken look intelligent  OMG!!!!!!

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	GOOF-IDIOT
Date:	3/2/2017 8:48:50 PM

Goofy lost his mission in life when the HILDA B...TCH got clobbered in November.  He just wanders around all day cussing us!

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/2/2017 9:11:06 PM

If you listen to the question that Franken asked from start to finish Sessions answered truthfully.  This is a complete joke and I wish for once the GOP would show some backbone.  This is the actual question and answer.

Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

It is very clear to me and anyone with half a brain that the question was about "Trump surrogates and the Russian government".  Sessions was not a Trump surrogate (even though he was called one at times) and did not communicate with the Russians about the campaign as he said in his response.  He met with the ambassador in his capacity as a Senator, one of them at a Heritage Foundation conference.  He did not lie and he maintains he did not act as a surrogate discussing the campaign on behalf of the Trump team.  This is just another example of the Democrats and their shills in the media attempting to delegitimize Trump rather than examining why they lost.  I hope they keep this fake stuff up because at some point if something real does occur who will believe them or the media.  Even a writer for the WaPo agrees this is fake.

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/2/2017 11:48:53 PM

I just saw where Rep. Elijah Cummings(D-MD), is calling for Sessions to resign. Cummings said "a lie is a lie, period. He knows the law. He's probably prosecuted people fot telling untrue statements to the FBI and others." Where was his concern about lies throughout Obama's tenure as President? In my opinion, the "worst" and most "damaging" lies told to the American people were when Obama said, "if you have a doctor you can keep your doctor, if you like your plan you can keep your plan, and your premiums will go down". Of colurse "lies" were pervasive during Obama's eight years.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 1:17:27 AM

Now, Sessions is going to provide a statement to the Judiciary committee that he had two meetings. Sounds like a statement from a liar. The Right can spin it but he lied.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 8:19:40 AM

No, he did not lie.  The question was about surrogates meating to talk to the Russians about the campaign.  He said he did not do that.  Now had Franken asked him if he has ever met with anyone from the Russian government in any capacity and he answered that way then he would either be lying or forgetful.  What I don't get is why this is important to you.  You don't seem to care when Dems lie about something that is actually important.  Try to have a modicum of intellectual honesty here.  The fact is you don't care about lying by politicians.  If you did you could never have voted for Obama for a second term or Hillary.  

Name:	lakngulf -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 8:37:35 AM

I do not post links often, and I know GF will say this is just FoxNews spin but Greg Jarrett's take on this is pretty good

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/02/gregg-jarrett-no-ms-pelosi-attorney-general-sessions-did-not-commit-perjury-or-crime.html

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 9:25:35 AM

MM - you said it with "half a brain"  GFY does not qualify.  He is operating on a level that is unknown to rational and sane people.  He can hardly get his bait on his hook.

All we can do it pity him.

Name:	Buteye -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 9:33:46 AM

I see nothing has changed about the way you respond to my posts. Yes, that is your prerogative. For the most part you usually respond to my initial posts in a negative and defensive way to try and avoid the main subject. Why can't you at least speak to the "lies" that transcended Obama's eight years and all of Hillary's "lies" about her Email scandal. It's ok with you that she met with numerous leaders of foreign countries soliciting millions of dollars of contributions to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State. What is being pursued against Sessions Is like comparing a "mountain" to a "mole hill" to the damage she and Obama has inflicted on the United States. I return to my original post and ask do you have no "sympathy" for the millions of people who lost their doctors and either lost their insurance or have seen their premiums and deductables skyrocket? I just returned from my meeting with a young man who is in his thirties(married with two children}, who handles my needs for my CPAC machine. He said his monthly insurance premiums are $1300.00 dollars. He said he never thought insurance coverage for his family would exceed his monthly mortgage payment. It is "sickening" to say the least when I saw the Democrats with their "wonderful" insurance plans paid for by we tax payers sitting on their "hands" during President Trump's speech to the nation. Why not let them "fend" for themselves like the rest of us have to do. Hopefully those who have "abandoned" their constituents will pay the price when their term limits are up.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions Lied
Date:	3/3/2017 10:19:03 AM

"While still in the Senate, Jeff Sessions met with the Russian Ambassador at least twice—once at his Senate office in September and once at an event at the Republican National Convention in July. Now-Attorney General Sessions omitted both these meetings in his testimony during his confirmation hearings. Sessions and his Trump backers pushed back against the revelations saying that it was, essentially, a misunderstanding—Sessions conducted those meetings in his role as United States Senator, not a Trump campaign adviser, therefore he didn't perjure himself. It was convenient, if hurried logic and it spread quickly. “He was literally conducting himself as a United States Senator,” Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Thursday. “This is what senators do in the course of conducting themselves in their jobs.”

Was Jeff Sessions conducting himself as a United States Senator at the RNC? Not so much. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that Sessions paid for the trip to Cleveland for the convention out of his own political funds, not his official congressional funding, and discussed the Trump campaign, obviously, during his remarks at the Heritage Foundation event where he met with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak. “One person at the Heritage event in Cleveland said Mr. Sessions left the impression he was there because of his role in the Trump campaign,” the Journal reports. “This person said Mr. Sessions’ remarks in part were focused on Mr. Trump’s trade policy, saying the then-candidate would do away with multilateral trade deals.” At the time, Sessions was the chairman of Trump’s National Security Advisory Committee."

From the Journal:

Larry Noble, general counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan advocacy group, said Mr. Sessions likely used his campaign account, rather than official Senate funds, because as a senior adviser to the Trump campaign it would have been difficult to argue that he wasn’t attending the convention for any political purpose. “If he was truly there solely as a member of the Armed Services Committee, then he could’ve used his legislative account,” Mr. Noble said.

"So, in short, on one of the two occasions that Jeff Sessions met with the Russian Ambassador he technically was not, in fact, acting in his role as a U.S. Senator. What was he then?"

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions Lied
Date:	3/3/2017 10:22:53 AM

and the fact that a Russian was at the RNC at all is just proof positive that the entire RNC colluded with Russia.  Damn have you ever noticed that Republican - Red ? wow holy schitt - there is another Proof positive iron clad evidence if I have ever heard it.

Your delusional and starting to make the Lame stream media look sane.

Name:	CRD -	Reply
Subject:	And who might this be ?
Date:	3/3/2017 10:24:40 AM

Sitting in the Democrat section at Trumps Tuesday address.

Name:	Talullahhound -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 10:24:44 AM

Sessions didn't lie.  He didn't meet with the Russian Ambassador in his role as a Trump supporter, he met with him as a member of Congress.  And no one has said who initiated the meeting.  I suspect it was the Russian.  It would be bad govenrment for Sessions to not meet with him.  Session should not resign.   I seem to think it is the black caucus in Congress that is behind this thinking.  For whatever reasons, they can't seem to get beyond things that happened 50 years ago and it frosts them that he was made AG over their objections.  So now they want to smear him. 

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions Lied
Date:	3/3/2017 10:34:06 AM

Larry Noble, general counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan advocacy group,

https://twitter.com/CampaignLegal?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

lets Just peruse Campaign Legal Center non Partasian Twitter listing.

Scrolling back into mid December - 100% anti Trump admin, Anti voter ID laws, pro felon voting rights.

Wow - so much PRO Hillary never did nothing wrong, ethical, legal wonderwoman.

LOL so much for your nonpartisan group - find another lier.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Nope
Date:	3/3/2017 11:27:40 AM

Asked and answered. We have known where and when they met but that's not really the question is it?  The question was about whether he was acting as a surrogate in meetings with Russians.  He answered the question truthfully. 

Name:	Mack -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/3/2017 6:28:40 PM

This meeting, which has the Democrats salivating and spearing their Trump voodoo dolls, surprise, surprise was set up by then Pres. Oblamer's White House Staff..

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully
Date:	3/6/2017 12:26:44 PM (updated 3/6/2017 12:27:15 PM)

So to prove collusion the D setup a meeting between the Russians and Sessions, or at least had a Russian present - then passed the information around as "proof".

We have every reason to fear our government regardless of who is in power.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Sessions answered truthfully But Chris Coons LIED!
Date:	3/6/2017 12:44:04 PM

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/5/chris-coons-walks-back-talk-of-russia-trump-collus/

Sen. Chris Coons, Delaware Democrat, on Sunday walked back his bombshell declaration about transcripts showing Russia-Trump collusion, saying he had no proof such documents exist and apologizing for any “hyperventilating.”

“I have no hard evidence of collusion,” Mr. Coons told “Fox News Sunday.”

D's are liars.