| Name: |
architect
- 
|
|
| Subject: |
Mark Sanford
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 9:11:23 AM (updated 4/18/2013 9:12:22 AM)
|
cheated on his wife and the people who elected him by taking the AT to it's southern terminus to make whoopee.
He lied about it until caught...so he "apologizes" and asks forgiveness from God and the people.
He made the "hike" on the taxpayer's dime (he paid at least part of it back after he was caught...that makes it OK)!
Now it comes out he is about to be back in court (3 days after the election) for breaking the divorce agreement by trespassing on his wife property on multiple occasions. He is also not making the agreed $5000/yr payments toward his son's college fund.
But, bottom line...he is acceptable because he is a conservative Republican who has asked redemption, and anyway the democrats do it worse and more often!
MM you know how to pick 'em, but you haven't learned how to defend 'em or explain 'em
|
| Name: |
wix
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Archi
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 9:36:50 AM
|
Looks like Sanford would make a good democrap.
Let's move on to a much bigger subject. Is o-BAMA sheltering the Boston bombers? Seems he met in secret with the Saudi's yesterday and a scheduled press conference in Boston by police was cancelled shortly after the meeting. The injured subject is being deported next Tuesday, very unusual. Is a coverup underway to protect the al Queda suspects and their Saudi clan? Is o-BAMA complicit?
|
| Name: |
h_hob
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Mark Sanford
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 9:57:54 AM
|
Archiebelle,
Has anyone ever explained to you how much your opinions are laughed at and scorned on this forum? Go clean up the Atlanta school district before another obama is produced from the Atlanta area and not Chicago.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
I didn't pick and I have never defended him
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 10:22:26 AM
|
Get your facts straight Archie before you post lies about me. And yes, you are lying and it is both unseemly and pathetic. And don't accuse me of no longer being civil as I will never be civil to someone that lies about me.
Find where I defended his actions or his nomination, the latter you know I cannot do legally because I don't live in his district or even in his state. I stated unequivocally that I would have never voted for him in the primary. And I stated I would only vote for him in a general election if his opponent was so bad for this country that even a moral degenerate Republican would be better.....a sad commentary on the current state of the modern Democrat party....
Vacation did not help your civility and I await your apology for lying about me........no doubt I will not hold my breath.
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Lock up
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 11:21:31 AM
|
bar the doors and load your arsenal Wixie...they'll be comin for ya at any minute...not the Feds, the guys in the white coats!!
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Hey Hob Snob
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 11:24:32 AM (updated 4/18/2013 11:27:42 AM)
|
See reply to Wixie above...sounds like you need to do the same.
BTW: Do you have any idea how your opinions are laughed at and scorned by the large majority of your fellow citizens of this great nation? Yes, I realize the opinion of the vast majority of this forum of my opinions...it gives me comfort and pride every hour of every day!
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
MM
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 11:38:25 AM (updated 4/18/2013 11:48:04 AM)
|
please point out where I lied about you (or anyone else for that matter). The body of my post was directed at the right wing nut crowd in general and not at any specific individual. The last sentence was directed at you not because you had been willing to answer my post a few weeks ago regarding Sanford. You did not defend Sanford, but you did say if you were in his district you likely would vote for him if the opponent was politically unacceptable. I'm I incorrect in my assumption that you still stand by that statement? If you do still stand by it, please explain to me how and why Sanford is more acceptable than his opponent. Please explain how you weigh political policy against moral shortcomings in deciding your vote. Would you ever consider a candidate so morally unacceptable in spite of political philosophy, that you might either not vote, write-in a candidate or even vote for the politically less acceptable but morally superior opponent?
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Glad to......will you apologize now?
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 11:44:05 AM
|
And I quote, "MM you know how to pick 'em, but you haven't learned how to defend 'em or explain 'em"
I never picked him, I could not pick him and you know it. That is a lie. Apology now? I am not holding my breath.
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
And again
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 12:44:09 PM
|
Please point out the statement that is deserving of an apology. If you are somehow offended by something I said, then I am sorry you were offended, but you have come no where near making me understand what that specific statement was or in justifying your insistance on an apology. Now, when can I expect your apology for specifically calling me a "baby killer"? I have been waiting for several years.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Its pointless....
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 1:06:56 PM
|
You said I know how to pick him......that is a lie. I never picked Sanford and you know full well that not only is that not true it could not be true because I live in Georgia. Forget the apology....it requires a certain amount of integrity that I have lost all hope that you would ever have. I would like to be surprised........but as I said I am not holding my breath and for good reason.......
|
| Name: |
GoneFishin
-
|
|
| Subject: |
TIME OUT
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 1:22:25 PM
|
Time out and go to the Forum corner to sulk and repent. Your kids would laugh at their dad if they read the Forum. Screw the apology. For the record, MM's position on Sanford...................
Name: | MartiniMan -  |  | | Subject: | He should run as a Dem | | Date: | 3/20/2013 9:56:10 AM |
Would be a resume enhancer. One thing I can tell you is I would never vote for him in a primary......not in a million years. But if he was the nominee for whatever office I would take a hard look at the Dem and if he was found wanting I would hold probably my nose and vote for him.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Already told him that
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 1:50:48 PM
|
He apparently for some weird and inexplicable reason thinks I picked Sanford......which is a lie, and he knows it.
|
Archie,
Large majority means, say, 65-35 wouldn't you think? The last elections presidential popular vote totals came in as 51-47 in favor of the incumbent, only a difference of 5 million votes out of a total of 130 million or so cast for all candidates. Would you agree hardly a large majority? The Repubs held the House, which is also known as "the people's house". I don't quite understand your generalizations at times and hence try to set the record straight, or as straight as I can make it. Now, whether Hob's views rare consistent with the 47%, only he can answer that.
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Hey Hob Snob
|
|
Date:
|
4/18/2013 4:51:38 PM
|
I know more people who voted for Romney than Obama...not one of them is as extreme in their beliefs as our friend here is as he so often makes clear by his posts. Most of the people who voted for Romney are very conservative but far from being in the black helicopter crowd with Hob snob, Wixie and several others who frequent this forum.
Again...the VAST majority laugh at the extreme positions expressed by not only Hob snob, but most of what comes across the Off-Topic wire!
|
I would also venture that the vast majority also tend to cringe when faced with the lunacy of the far left. Barney Frank, Sheila J. Lee, Harry Reid come to immediate mind.........
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Per GF's repost
|
|
Date:
|
4/19/2013 1:45:50 PM (updated 4/19/2013 1:53:40 PM)
|
of your original response on Sanford It is there written in the King's English "I would hold my nose and vote for him". I guess you can split hairs and say "Vote for" is not synonymous with "pick"...you can but I can't. In your own words you said you would vote for a conservative liar and moral midget over a Democrat you "found wanting"...I think that is a very sad and perhaps cowardly position for a man who so often defends standing by principles no matter what. Which "principle" takes precedent in your mind? Now do you have any comment on your branding me as a "baby killer"?
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Is that the best you can do?
|
|
Date:
|
4/19/2013 3:00:14 PM
|
Archie, I absolutely stand by my hypothetical because yes, a degenerate Republican that votes in a conservative way is infinitely better than a totally moral and upstanding Dem that is wrong on the issues and votes to destroy this country economically, militarily or socially. Given no other alternative, I will take a politician that is right on the issues but has personal failings over one that is wrong on the issues. I suspect you would vote for Mussolini if he was pro abortion, wanted to raise taxes on the so-called rich, believed in globaloney, etc. No one promises us a perfect choice every time and in my case, I will take the lesser of two evils any day as evidenced by my support of the last two GOP nominees, neither of which I picked.
But it is moot as I cannot vote for him because I don't live in his district, I would never send him a dime of support and I did not, would not and could not pick him.......so keep on trying to grasp at straws........but you lied about me. Deal with it.......
By the way, notice you have been silent on the Boston bombing perps........still in mourning that it wasn't a white tea party guy? You're not alone......the White House is filled with em as is the govt media and academia.
|
| Name: |
h_hob
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Is that the best you can do?
|
|
Date:
|
4/19/2013 5:08:48 PM
|
Do you think they will ever get the stench out of the white house after all the liberals that have been in there for obama's terms?
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Sunshine and bleach will be needed
|
|
Date:
|
4/19/2013 5:39:02 PM
|
and in copious amounts.
|
| Name: |
architect
-
|
|
| Subject: |
As usual MM
|
|
Date:
|
4/20/2013 9:10:24 AM
|
Your words confirm mine.
I'm still waiting for your apology or at least comment about the most vile of many vile things you have said of me before your "conversion" to civility...civility (sort of) in words if not in thoughts.
|
| Name: |
h_hob
-
|
|
| Subject: |
As usual MM
|
|
Date:
|
4/20/2013 9:14:25 AM
|
I don't think MM needs to apologize for not bowing to your way of thinking. He isn't obama.
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Only in your dreams
|
|
Date:
|
4/20/2013 10:12:10 AM
|
What about what I wrote means I picked him? You are having your usual challenge with facts, logic and reason. As for your desire for me to apologize about the truth being said I will decline. If you vote for a pro abortion politician your are complicit in the murder of babies. But I am sure you are proud of that since you love the idea of having babies murdered in the womb. Sent money to Gosnell's defense fund yet?
How about this, I will no longer remind people that you are complicit in the murder of innocent babies and you will refrain from lying about me. Seems like a fair exchange, assuming you have the ability to comprehend the meaning of what people write.....heck, even GF recognized I never picked Sanford. It requires so,little intellectual capacity to understand that is a lie that I am mystified by your refusal to acknowledge that.......actually I'm not. You still think Obama has been a good president when it is objectively true that he has been a pathetic failure domestically and internationally and his only true legislative accomplishment is still wildly unpopular and even Democrats are coming out in droves admitting it is a disaster.
|
|
New Post
Search
Off-Topic Forum
Reply
»
Minnesota Lakes
»
Upper Red Lake
Login
|
Home
