Forum Thread
(Tuttle Creek Lake Specific)
1 messages
Updated 5/27/2019 1:22:39 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,091 messages
Updated 11/8/2024 10:28:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Tuttle Creek Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Tuttle Creek Lake Photo Gallery





    
Name:   architect - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/11/2013 6:30:54 PM (updated 4/11/2013 6:50:05 PM)

shows an unexpectedly large drop of 42,000 (11%) in new unemployment insurance filings, yet not one word from the usual Obama blamers on our friendly little forum.  Does anybody think MM and WW among others could have been struck dumb if the report had shown a 42,000 increase?  I mean really...think about it for a change...what is the real agenda of our Tea Party brethren? Are they trying to save America or destroy the man we the people elected president?  I ask again, where was your forum posts of outrage in late 2008 when a man with an R after his name sat in the Oval Office, unemployment insurance claims were consistently over 800,000 / week and net job growth ran at negative 800,000 / month for month after month?

Now, go ahead ignore the question by changing  the subject to the Atlanta School scandal, or how Obama always blames Bush, or how Obama is going to take your guns, etc  etc ad nauseum .  I don't really expect an answer...to quote MM "you are always predictable".



Name:   wix - Email Member
Subject:   Archy,
Date:   4/11/2013 8:45:57 PM

I honestly do not remember the results last week. Wasn't there a huge unexpected increase last week. Is California up to their old tricks?



Name:   buzzbuster - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/11/2013 9:24:04 PM

 Yawn



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/11/2013 9:56:24 PM

Leave it to Archy to find a solitary petunia in a giant cesspool.



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   You are so predictable
Date:   4/11/2013 10:30:14 PM (updated 4/11/2013 10:35:39 PM)

Nothing much to say when the news is bad but glad to show up with a glimmer of positive news. Tell me Archie, how does a drop in new claims help the 600,000 last month that gave up ever finding a jobl?!?!?!? Why dont you answer that question, huh???? How does it help matters when 350,000 people lose their job while 90,000 newjobs are created!??!?!? Are you so incapable of critical thought that simple math is too much for you to absorb and comprehend? Here we go folks.....the good news in the war is that last month 380,000 soldiers were killed but only 350,000 were killed this month. Time to celebrate!!!! Woooooohhooooooooo!!!!!!! Life is good and it's time to pop the champagne corks!!!! And none of that negativity about 350,000 soldiers being killed.......that's 30,000 less than last month. You guys and your cup being half full..... Honestly Archie, can't you see how pathetic those numbers are four years into a so-called recovery?!?!? I know.....it's too early to tell........the affirmative action president needs more time cause he's just a black man and we can't expect so much out of him. No wonder he doesn't think any of us built what we have.........that's been his life experience and you guilty while liberals are the primary enablers of his pathos. Crowing about numbers that are terrible, but somehow better than projected, is likewise pathetic. Get with reality Archie, we are supposed to be in a recovery!!!!!! We are not in a recession. This isn't that mentally challenging but for some reason you don't seem to know the difference.



Name:   architect - Email Member
Subject:   Mr H
Date:   4/12/2013 7:28:40 AM (updated 4/12/2013 7:33:53 AM)

Some us are still able to admire a flower wherever it grows...obviously, a lot of us aren't and had rather rush to give it a verbal shot of herbicide.



Name:   architect - Email Member
Subject:   You are so predictable
Date:   4/12/2013 7:29:37 AM (updated 4/12/2013 7:33:06 AM)

DITTO!!!  Now, did you notice there was a question in my original comment?  Did you notice there is a question in this comment?



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   Archie and GF
Date:   4/12/2013 8:59:58 AM

Both have the same approach to debate.....never answer a question from others that might diminish their point, but demand answers to any and all questions they pose. A wee bit hypocritical.



Name:   MrHodja - Email Member
Subject:   Mr H
Date:   4/12/2013 9:03:03 AM

And there was probably an air pocket or two in the Titanic when it went down.



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   Did you read your own post?
Date:   4/12/2013 9:09:38 AM

There were multiple questions.  Archie, my point is that you are inanely fixated on a drop in claims as if the actual number of claims is meaningless.  The reason we don't post about an unexpected drop is because each and every month, month in and month out, year after year, the number is "unexpected" and different than what the so-called "experts" expected.  That to me gets a little old and a little redundant and hardly worthy of comment.  It would be like the weatherman expected a high of 35 degrees but it was 25 degrees.  You would focus on the fact that it was 10 degrees colder than the expert expected. My focus would be on the fact that it was below freezing and the roads might be icy.

The cold, hard reality which you cannot seen to grasp is that whether it has gone down or up 42,000, the number of jobless claims is pathetically high, especially since we are supposed to be four years into a recovery.  And I have already answered your comment about the job losses during the recession on two occasions.  I won't repeat myself. Your willingness to compare Obama's economic performance in a recovery to the results during a recession is yet another example of lower standards for the affirmative action president by a guilty while liberal suffering from the soft bigotry of low expectations for the black guy.  As for me, I hold him to the standard of performance of other presidents during an economic recovery and using that criteria he is an abject, miserable failure.  But then again, I could care less about the color of his skin and hold him to the same standards as his predecessors.  

Why don't you?  Why are you afraid to answer that question?  I've answered yours multiple times........the truth is too painful to acknowledge?????



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   LOL!
Date:   4/12/2013 9:16:26 AM

Now that was a great retort.  I can assure you Archie would have been rearranging the deck chairs and enjoying the band as the Titanic went down.  And if Obama were the captain he would certainly not hold him to account for running into the iceberg.....in fact, he would blame Bush for that iceberg.........he would say, "Did you notice that iceberg was 20% smaller than the other icebergs around it?"  Or maybe, "That iceberg was not where experts expected it to be which is really the issue here."  What he thinks is important and good news is amazing in the midst of this so-called recovery.

Totally mystifying to me and Archie refuses to answer why he has such low standards of performance for our first black President.  I have my suspicions but I welcome his explanation........



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   Its even worse than that
Date:   4/12/2013 9:26:59 AM

Even if you answer the question they pretend as if you didn't because they don't like or can't really respond to the answer.



Name:   Council Roc Doc - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/12/2013 10:38:47 AM

Archie, be intellectually honest.  If you look at the following data, unemploymnent insurance filings, sure for the week of April 6, it went down.  But that was only a one time correction for the increase of 47K the previous two weeks.  If you can look at the following data and be excited for the one time improvement , be my quest.  The difference from a year ago is a paltry 22k.  How can you rejoice in this?
Data for this Date Range  
April 6, 2013 346.00K
March 30, 2013 388.00K
March 23, 2013 357.00K
March 16, 2013 341.00K
March 9, 2013 334.00K
March 2, 2013 340.00K
Feb. 23, 2013 348.00K
Feb. 16, 2013 366.00K
Feb. 9, 2013 348.00K
Feb. 2, 2013 361.00K
Jan. 26, 2013 374.00K
Jan. 19, 2013 343.00K
Jan. 12, 2013 350.00K
Jan. 5, 2013 373.00K
Dec. 29, 2012 372.00K
Dec. 22, 2012 366.00K
Dec. 15, 2012 366.00K
Dec. 8, 2012 354.00K
Dec. 1, 2012 370.00K
Nov. 24, 2012 390.00K
Nov. 17, 2012 400.00K
Nov. 10, 2012 451.00K
Nov. 3, 2012 363.00K
Oct. 27, 2012 367.00K
Oct. 20, 2012 372.00K
   
Oct. 13, 2012 384.00K
Oct. 6, 2012 352.00K
Sept. 29, 2012 369.00K
Sept. 22, 2012 363.00K
Sept. 15, 2012 385.00K
Sept. 8, 2012 385.00K
Sept. 1, 2012 367.00K
Aug. 25, 2012 377.00K
Aug. 18, 2012 374.00K
Aug. 11, 2012 369.00K
Aug. 4, 2012 364.00K
July 28, 2012 368.00K
July 21, 2012 357.00K
July 14, 2012 388.00K
July 7, 2012 352.00K
June 30, 2012 376.00K
June 23, 2012 388.00K
June 16, 2012 392.00K
June 9, 2012 389.00K
June 2, 2012 380.00K
May 26, 2012 389.00K
May 19, 2012 373.00K
May 12, 2012 372.00K
May 5, 2012 370.00K
April 28, 2012 368.00K




Name:   Council Roc Doc - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/12/2013 10:53:13 AM

Archie, this is the same data for unemployment insurance filings for all of 2008.  Where is the 800,000 again? Don't let the facts get in your way........


Dates:
 to
Viewing 1 of 2   First  Previous     Last
Data for this Date Range  
Dec. 27, 2008 524.00K
Dec. 20, 2008 584.00K
Dec. 13, 2008 560.00K
Dec. 6, 2008 563.00K
Nov. 29, 2008 532.00K
Nov. 22, 2008 536.00K
Nov. 15, 2008 542.00K
Nov. 8, 2008 510.00K
Nov. 1, 2008 490.00K
Oct. 25, 2008 481.00K
Oct. 18, 2008 481.00K
Oct. 11, 2008 462.00K
Oct. 4, 2008 481.00K
Sept. 27, 2008 483.00K
Sept. 20, 2008 484.00K
Sept. 13, 2008 454.00K
Sept. 6, 2008 445.00K
Aug. 30, 2008 443.00K
Aug. 23, 2008 424.00K
Aug. 16, 2008 425.00K
Aug. 9, 2008 430.00K
Aug. 2, 2008 447.00K
July 26, 2008 433.00K
July 19, 2008 403.00K
July 12, 2008 386.00K
   
July 5, 2008 373.00K
June 28, 2008 395.00K
June 21, 2008 386.00K
June 14, 2008 381.00K
June 7, 2008 385.00K
May 31, 2008 365.00K
May 24, 2008 372.00K
May 17, 2008 369.00K
May 10, 2008 366.00K
May 3, 2008 376.00K
April 26, 2008 374.00K
April 19, 2008 352.00K
April 12, 2008 365.00K
April 5, 2008 355.00K
March 29, 2008 382.00K
March 22, 2008 367.00K
March 15, 2008 365.00K
March 8, 2008 347.00K
March 1, 2008 343.00K
Feb. 23, 2008 349.00K
Feb. 16, 2008 339.00K
Feb. 9, 2008 341.00K
Feb. 2, 2008 351.00K
Jan. 26, 2008 368.00K
Jan. 19, 2008 318.00K




Name:   Lifer - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/12/2013 11:46:53 AM

Hey doc it's pointless.  He only listens to the voices in his head and  the ones on PMSNBC.

"Never try to teach a pig to sing, it waists your time and annoys the pig."  LL



Name:   Council Roc Doc - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/12/2013 1:04:35 PM

Essentially, 7 less unemployment insurance filings  per county in the lower 48, Alaska and Hawaii than 1 year ago.  And this after 5 years in office and unprecedented trillions of national debt and the debt of Obamacare staring at you in the rearview mirrow.....I am clicking my heels Archie.



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   But its down and better than expected!!!!
Date:   4/12/2013 1:14:06 PM

That is apparently all that matters to the left.  They also struggle with the math that it is not good news when 300K+ people lose their jobs and 100K+/- jobs are created and you need to 175K+ just to keep up with population growth. 



Name:   architect - Email Member
Subject:   Well Mr H
Date:   4/12/2013 1:40:19 PM

Isn't hypocrisy a two way street?  If I don't give the answer to your question...I'm a hypocrite.  If you don't give an answer my...question I'm a hypocrite.  What am I missing here...what are you missing here?



Name:   h_hob - Email Member
Subject:   Today's BLS report
Date:   4/12/2013 4:10:09 PM


All of you should be ashamed of yourselves, picking on Archiebelle, Copperpiece and GFY like that.  It is like dueling with unarmed men.  In so much as they are intellectually handicapped.  Someone accused one of them of having to ride the short bus to school each day.  The only thing I can say about that is, "All three of them had to ride the short bus to school."



Name:   GoneFishin - Email Member
Subject:   Hey Sweetie Hob Knob
Date:   4/12/2013 11:31:55 PM

You know so little and say even less. Sweet dreams cutie pie.



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   Archie disappears when faced with facts
Date:   4/15/2013 8:03:22 AM (updated 4/15/2013 8:04:59 AM)

Where did you go?  You go t your answer so I guess we are not nearly as predictable as you are.  You claimed 800K job losses in 2008 and CDR proved you wrong.  You claimed happy news and everyone proved you wrong.  And suddenly you disappear????  C'mon Archie, you started this thread claiming all sorts of joyful news.  A little dose of truth versus fiction and you drive away?  You can do better than that!  We're waiting................



Name:   architect - Email Member
Subject:   I'm at the beach MM
Date:   4/16/2013 9:20:02 AM (updated 4/16/2013 9:22:52 AM)

and only checked this forum this morning for the first time since Saturday. I have not even read the posts above your last one on April 15. I will do that now and fully expect (LOL) to see your answer in defense of your seeming hypocrisy in holding George W Bush (R) and Barack Obama (D) to different standards on economic matters...at least when it comes to what you have seen fit to post?



Name:   MartiniMan - Email Member
Subject:   I am happy to compare the two
Date:   4/16/2013 5:04:04 PM

Archie, do you really want to compare the totality of Bush's record against Obama's?  I would be happy to do that because you will see how much worse Obama has been.  Just one example, Bush generated $5 trillion of new debt in 8 years, Obama is on track to generate $10 trillion and leave us with tens of trillions in long-term entitlement obligations that never existed before.  I have already shown you factually what Obama has done to devastate the labor participation rate in four short years versus Bush's mediocrity during his tenure.  I could go on and on but for some reason what you want to do is compare the best Obama has done with the worst of Bush's tenure.  Not exactly intellectually honest, right?

And by the way, CDR provided actual numbers from 2008 that refuted your 800,000 claim.  Any response? It seems to me looking at those numbers in the midst of a recession and comparing to Obama's numbers after four years into a so-called recovery that Obama is looking pretty bad........







Quick Links
Tuttle Creek Lake News
Tuttle Creek Lake Photos
Tuttle Creek Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
TuttleCreek.LakesOnline.com
THE TUTTLE CREEK LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal