Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	“urban dimokrap”
Date:	5/15/2018 8:51:54 AM

I just heard the above term on abc news this morning.  Would someone please define the term “urban dimokrap” for us.  Since the term came from a talking head on liberal idiot media, it probably will need one of our finest idiots to respond.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	“urban dimokrap”
Date:	5/15/2018 9:01:53 AM

Wix, I suspect they are talking about the fact that it is no longer a matter of "red state-blue state" in our divided politics.  It's really a matter of "red country-blue cities".  Liberals tend to congregate in large urban areas, sort of like city-states of ancient Greece while more conservative people tend not to gravitate to the large urban areas.  In my view that's why so many liberals think the world is overcrowded, pollution is worse than it really is, the homeless are everywhere, gun violence is rampant, etc.  That is their living experience because they are congregating in large urban areas and voting for policies that cause many of these problems.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	“urban dimokrap”
Date:	5/15/2018 9:33:50 AM

Kinda like Racist Republican.

Name:	Old Diver -	Reply
Subject:	Racist Republican
Date:	5/15/2018 11:26:01 AM

   If Republicans are so racist, why is it that every other word coming out of a democrook's mouth about race? Especially when loosing an argument. They have lost traditional American society and now only represent minorities that they rile up  lead around by the nose by telling them that they better vote Democrook or the big bad Republicans are going to take away their check. On and on and on!

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	“urban dimokrap”
Date:	5/15/2018 12:18:18 PM

Yeah, like Abe Lincoln and all the Republicans that voted for the Civil Rights Act as opposed to Robert KKK Byrd, Algore, Sr. George Wallace, Harry Truman, Hugo Black, et al.  Not to mention the first seven African Americans elected to Congress were all Republicans so I guess they were likewise racists.  I know, you think it's racist to be for personal responsibility and intact families and avoiding out of wedlock children and dependence on government.  The subtle bigotry of low expectations which is the hallmark of left wing nuts and the Democrat party.

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Racist Republican
Date:	5/16/2018 6:21:51 PM (updated 5/16/2018 6:26:14 PM)

Diver, you may be on to something. Looks like you are a thoughful individual. 

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	Fact of Life
Date:	5/16/2018 6:21:52 PM (updated 5/16/2018 6:23:35 PM)

Personal responsibility and avoiding children out of wedlock, both which I support, also includes the use of birth control which I know you oppose. You appear to want to abandon the kids when they are born and are in need of support for health insurance, food, and a roof. After all, big government is only important to you and your fellow Deplorables if a hurricane hit your neighborhood.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	Fact of Life
Date:	5/17/2018 8:29:58 AM

Personal responsibility and avoiding children out of wedlock, both which I support, also includes the use of birth control which I know you oppose.

You appear to want to abandon the kids when they are born and are in need of support for health insurance, food, and a roof. After all, big government is only important to you and your fellow Deplorables if a hurricane hit your neighborhood.

How does your support for PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY translate into big government will fix all the problems in your life, even the ones you caused yourself?

Personal responisbility involves getting out of the basement, get a job, pay your bills.  I would love to know where I am guaranteed food, roof and health insurance, because I must have been doing it wrong my whole life by having a job, learning skills for better pay and benefits so that I could afford that roof, food and insurance.

I have insurnace on my home that should cover most things including hurricanes, I do not think I am covered for volcano, but those are rare in central Alabama.

Sat around playing X-Box all day, I deserve $15 an hour to sit on my a$$ in mama's basement playing xbox.  After eating too much KFC, the guberment doctors should filter the gravy from their veins and make em all better.  When stealing from Granny to get some money for some crack, got shot by a racist gun and now I demand that not only do they fix me for free, but guns should be outlawed so criminals wont get shot no more.

You are an idiot.  Lady boss and puppets say hello to Ol Gfy.

Name:	MartiniMan -	Reply
Subject:	Fact of Life
Date:	5/17/2018 8:30:53 AM

Yeah, imagine the concept of abstinence, which works every time its tried.  Here's a question for you Goofy.  Contraception is widely available today and yet close to 70% of African American kids are born out of wedlock versus 25% forty years ago.  And the data is irrefutable about the negative impact of out of wedlock birth has on future success in life.  So how's that working out for that community?  So while I am personally opposed to contraception it is the law of the land and no one is proposing that be changed, including me.  I would prefer that people learn the negative impact of pre-marital sex and the devastating results of out of wedlock births and simply decide that they will wait for marriage.   That is how we make contraception safe, legal and rare.  And I am under no illusions about when or if this will ever happen but it would be best for everyone if it did.

As for your so-called point about providing government assistance to the poor starving kiddos, nothing could be further from the truth.  Most conservatives prefer that this kind of assistance be provided not by the federal government but by state and local government and private charity (conistent with the principle of subsidiarity) and that it be done in a way that only the truly needy receive it in a way that doesn't breed generational dependency on government.  If some state wants to load up their budget and tax the living crap out of their citizens to perpetuate dependency then let them have at it (consistent with the principle of Federalism).  They will reap what they sow and like California, Illinois, etc. will see a mass exodus of hard working people and businesses for more reasonable states and a massive influx of freeloaders. 

Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not the proper role of the Federal government.  It should be limited to its proper role of national defense, infrastructure, etc. (consistent with the Constitution).

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/17/2018 12:49:20 PM

"You are an idiot ." Too bad, you can't state your opinion and we can have some dialogue. Nothing wrong disagreeing.. FYI, I don't suupport government programs to enable adults to live in their parents  basement and play video games.. My comments referred to infants and kids who need a hand to make it to adulthood.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/17/2018 1:12:37 PM

My opinion is that parents should have "personal responisibilty" for their choices, including their children.  

My opinion stands that you are an idiot.  You state that you believe in personal responsibility, but feel that children are an exception.  I feel that the parents need to take care of their children or quit creating them.  They can put on a condom handed out freely from K-12 and higher ed, they can go to the clinic to get free birth control - if all these services are free and more available then M&M's at the corner store - the only thing left is personal responsibility to get off their a$$'s and go down to the clinic or the local CVS before they decide to play hide the sausage and make a new baby.

that child / infant / unborn glob of cells did not decide one day to be created - it took people who should fall under your personal responisibilty catagory to have either decided to have a child or not, or gave into their base emotions and said well that trip to CVS was not important and I can just go to town with suzie this one time and nothing bad will happen.

The left wants to start sex ed in Pre-k, can not impose a gender till they are old enough to make a decision for themselves.  But the people who are popping these kids out faster then an AR-15 with large capacity magazines and a bump stock get a pass in your  personal responisibility, because they are just children and infants, not responsible people, but the sperm and egg donor get a pass from having to raise that child and its financial requirements by you.  

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/17/2018 4:57:53 PM (updated 5/17/2018 5:10:18 PM)

I started to read your rant but you seem to fail to understand that I don't accept all these wedlock babies. 72% of black babies are wedlock babies. 66% are Native Indian, 53% Hispanic, and 29% White. Obviously, the majority are white  because of the large white population. 

Personal Responsibility also includes abortion. If you don't want abortion, and many on the right don't want birth control...then you  have a moral obliigation to provide the basics if the parents are deadbeats. Or, do you believe that life can end after birth with no moral issue?

I do know Trump is  a great example of Personal Responsibility and sets a great example for the youth you citicize. His Personal Responsibilty motto is....Find em, Screw em, Pay em, and Deny it....

Name:	wix -	Reply
Subject:	GOOF-DUMBASS
Date:	5/17/2018 6:06:44 PM

You twisted facts in the usual liberal-idiot fashion in the above post.  Those percentages by race are for OUT OF WEDLOCK births not in wedlock as you posted.  I could forgive a normal human for an innocent mistake.......BUT NOT YOU.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/17/2018 6:09:57 PM

While some on the right may say no to BC pills and condoms they are in the minority.  That ship has already set sail and regardless of their beliefs I do not believe all of a sudden we are going to decide that abortion is legal but condoms and BC pills are illegal only making the problem worse when little Johnnie decides to go play Dr. with little Suzie.  

Personally I say abortion is fine, if a woman wants to murder her unborn - I say better before it is born, so it does not have to suffer for its parents stupidity and be sold for a crack rock, abandoned, pushed into prostitution(child or other).

For that matter we should also allow retroactive abortion to the ones who keep pumping them out and not having any personal responsibility.

You want to claim that republicans all want to do away with all birth control because of a small minority, while in your own party a small minority wants men in the ladies rooms because they wore panties that day and make it your platform.

Trump did have personal responsibility - he didnt knock up Stormy unlike Bill Clinton -  So find-em, em pay em , deny it, skip child support, have Hillary talk about the Right wing Bimbo eruptions and refuse personal responsibility...? 

Which is better Trump and the porn star, or Bill and the prostitute?  I am guessing both got paid.......  But I guess since it was probably like $20 vs 130K that makes a huge difference in your eyes.  To me they are both selling their goods, Stormey just got a much better deal, wants more after the fact and did not end up with a mini-me.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3833298/The-black-man-claiming-Bill-Clinton-s-love-child-likens-treatment-former-couple-child-master-SLAVE-banished-wife-Hillary-Clinton.html

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	RACIST WIX
Date:	5/17/2018 7:29:38 PM

Thanks for your input. You are one of the smarter racists. 

Name:	GoneFishin -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/17/2018 7:38:13 PM

Clinton and Trump have one thing  in common...they are both perverts. The religious right is willing to overlook Trump which just shows that everyone has their price. I guess there are really only 9 Commandments....

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	PHIL
Date:	5/18/2018 8:45:13 AM (updated 5/18/2018 9:22:17 AM)

Better 9 on the right then zero on the left.  The non-standard having left has overlooked everything for everyone on the dem side for years, murder, rape, abuse - If the left held people to a higher standard then right - you might have an arguement, instead you look foolish and hypocritical and well you are what you are.

All we hear from the left is that the constitution is a living document and that it must change with the times, and you want to quote biblical law from around 2000 years ago as it is set in stone tablets still to this day.

People sin and have sin in their lives.  People are not perfect.  Love the sinner but hate the sin.  You need to get back to Sunday school.

I have not been to church in 10+ years, and I am doing better then you on scripture, and that is just bigly sad.

Name:	phil -	Reply
Subject:	For GFY to Ponder
Date:	5/18/2018 3:48:17 PM (updated 5/18/2018 4:01:49 PM)

GFY

"Personal Responsibility also includes abortion. If you don't want abortion, and many on the right don't want birth control...then you  have a moral obliigation to provide the basics if the parents are deadbeats. Or, do you believe that life can end after birth with no moral issue?"

My question to you based on your post I have quoted above. 

A. Someone does something that has a consequence

B. I do not agree with what they did.

C. I now have a moral obligation to provide the "basics" whatever that means because I disagree with the actions ?  So I as someone who does not know this person through the act of disagreeing with their actions am now morally and financially obligated to provide for that person or the results of their action or inaction?

I can not follow through your logic and would like to have this adult conversation with you without name calling and puppets.

So by your logic,

The person sitting in mama's basement playing X-Box and not being a productive member of society should get the basics because of his choices.

Someone who does drugs or drives drunk should get the basics. or do we need to provide the person he/she hits the "basics" since that is the result of his or her actions? 

Someone who has unprotected sex often and has multple children from multiple dead beat dads deserves the basics as well as their offspring and the deadbeat dads need that "basics" as well because I do not like the fact that they are not helping to raise their kids financially or otherwise.

At what point does personal responsibility kick in for you?  You indicated you were refering to born children, as you apparently removed the unborn from your concepts of the basics.  You also stated that Bubba Joe in the basement with the X-Box was also not part of your theory on "basics".  so are we talking birth to 18?  At what point do you no longer care about the basics? Do you hate the elderly so much that you would not offer them the basics? Or is it just the unborn?

If a 25 year old loses her job with two kids because the plant got shut down, is that too old for your basics?  Sam 25 year old lost her job with two kids because she slapped her boss - does she deserve the basics? 

Someone lost their house to fire, they can move in with you to provide the basics? or just their kids can move in with you?

Someone lost the house due to financial fraud, poor financial decisions etc - can they move in with you as well so you can provide their kids with the basics?

I can care and offer assistance to lots more people when down on their luck when personal decisions did not put them in their situtation vs someome whos actions pretty much predicted where they are now.

I go back to a guy begging for food at a McDonalds downtown Birmingham.  Man I have not had anything to eat in days, I offered him a sandwith w fries still in the bag that I purchase for someone else - his comment was "F U"  Told him well I guess your not that hungry and I damn sure wont be giving you cash.

So what you are saying is that you disagree with me often - I am waiting on my "basics" from you.  Please make the check out to I@will_not_hold_my_breath.com  Please - you have a moral obligation since you disagree with my opinions and choices - or do you need to make the check out to my children?