(Lake Martin Specific)
111,234 messages
Updated 11/3/2024 8:10:01 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,091 messages
Updated 11/8/2024 10:28:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
4,171 messages
Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
(Lake Martin Specific)
169 messages
Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
| Name: |
waterph
- 
|
|
| Subject: |
Decatur Daily Article for Obam
|
|
Date:
|
11/2/2008 7:16:46 PM
|
Attaached is a copy of the article from the Decatur Daily copied to show the reporter's thought process for deciding to vote for Obama for President. Needless to say, there was not another article from a pro McCain reporter in the Sunday paper. This is not and has never recently demonstrated a position of fair and balanced.
Since the Daily has a reputation of being a "Yellow Dog Democrat" paper, many of the readers that I talked with were not impressed with the reporter's arguments for voting for Obama. This newspaper has openly supported Obama, Why would of its reporters not follow instructions and author an article that is pro Obama. This article is another example of the bias in the press across this country for Obama. Are we moving toward a single party system (Democrats) in this country?
"Why I am voting for Obama"
Capital considerations
A free market is the best method devised for optimizing the condition of all citizens.
Many of the changes proposed by Sen. Barack Obama would restrain the free market.
Obama provides America with its best opportunity for preserving a free market.
I believe all three of the above sentences to be true.
The starting point in resolving the apparent inconsistencies is this: We live in a democracy that provides the rich and the poor with an equal vote. If more than 50 percent of the population concludes that capitalism does not maximize their well-being, they can choose another economic system.
Income polarization
The top 20 percent of income producers in Morgan County earn 15 times as much as the bottom 20 percent, and the number of people in between is shrinking.
Between 1997 and last year, the percentage of Decatur students eligible for free or reduced lunches climbed from 34 percent to 51 percent.
In an authoritarian state, income polarization creates structural problems only when it results in violence. In a democracy, though, problems come sooner.
For the rich, Obama is a compromise. Despite his opponent’s claims, he is not a socialist. He does not advocate state control of the means of production. For those like me, who are not rich but believe a free market — within reason — benefits all segments of the population, Obama is a compromise, too. His economic policies are far more capitalism-friendly than possible alternatives.
Obama promises increased wealth redistribution in exchange for the preservation of capitalism.
Trickling up
Former President Reagan provided a great talking point for Democrats when he mentioned wealth “trickling down.”
In many respects, though, he had it right. Those who control the most capital are best able to allocate resources for universal benefit. They won the Monopoly game, and that suggests they know what they are doing.
Our current economic crisis, though, is a reminder that the system breaks if there is no wealth trickling up.
Consumers drive the economy. If they cannot make their mortgage payments, the housing market crumbles. If they are not buying merchandise, no federal bailout will persuade banks to loan money to businesses because banks know there is no demand to keep their borrowers afloat.
Obama recognized the need for the bailout of banks, even though it was contrary to his “trickle up” approach. He also understands that our economic system cannot grow with dropping real wages. If consumers can’t buy, manufacturers can’t sell their product. If manufacturers’ can’t sell, banks have no incentive to lend.
I am a free-market enthusiast, but I am convinced an unrestrained free market cannot survive in a democracy. When a politician like Obama comes along who respects the free market, but sees the need to funnel more money to the consumer, we should support him.
The greed that is toppling our system is not financial; it is political. We live in a democracy that gives a vote to those who have little income and no capital. We need to recognize their power.
Contact Eric Fleischauer at eric@decaturdaily.com.
|
| Name: |
waterph
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Media Bias
|
|
Date:
|
11/2/2008 7:55:09 PM
|
Study: Media reports have favored Obama
By David Bauder
AP Television Writer
NEW YORK — John McCain supporters who believe they haven’t gotten a fair shake from the media during the Republican’s candidacy against Barack Obama have a new study to point to.
Comments made by sources, voters, reporters and anchors that aired on ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts over the past two months reflected positively on Obama in 65 percent of cases, compared to 31 percent of cases with regards to McCain, according to the Center for Media and Public Affairs.
ABC’s “World News” had more balance than NBC’s “Nightly News” or the “CBS Evening News,” the group said.
Meanwhile, the first half of Fox News Channel’s “Special Report” with Brit Hume showed more balance than any of the network broadcasters, although it was dominated by negative evaluations of both campaigns. The center didn’t evaluate programs on CNN or MSNBC.
“For whatever reason, the media are portraying Barack Obama as a better choice for president than John McCain,” said Robert Lichter, a George Mason University professor and head of the center. “If you watch the evening news, you’d think you should vote for Obama.”
|
| Name: |
MartiniMan
-
|
|
| Subject: |
Clueless
|
|
Date:
|
11/2/2008 10:23:38 PM
|
That article is the most clueless piece of journalism I have read in a long time. It is a walking, talking contradiction filled with unmitigated nonesense. To portray Obama as the salvation for free markets is like portraying Margaret Sanger as the salvation for Natural Family Planning! I had to read it twice to make sure it was as stupid as my first reading. It was! I guarantee this guy is a product of government schools all the way because an intelligent person with a modicum of sense would never write something so vacuuous. Tis better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
|
|
|
New Post
Search
Off-Topic Forum
Reply
»
Alabama Lakes
»
Lake Martin
Login
|
Home
