Name:   architect - Subject:   LnG Date:   7/29/2016 10:32:21 AM

You are completely correct ''it's the alternative, stupid'' and in my stupid and humble opinion, Hillary is, sadly but by a long country mile the far less dangerous of the alternatives this time around.  I am sorry, but I find if very difficult to fathom how anyone who actually is trying to vote in the best interest of America and who listens to what Trump says and does and advocates, can think otherwise. 

Can anyone of the diehard GOP advocvates on this forum say with complete honesty that they would still be supporting Trump if he had the D after his name and, shall we say, Michael Bloomberg or perhaps an old Republican liberal lion such as Jacob Javits or Nelson Rockefeller was the man with the R at the end?  I know that such an option in the modern GOP is impossible, but just for fun what would happen if it happened.  Truth be known, in 2016 Nelson Rockefeller would get AL's vote for no other reason than the R after his name just as certainly as in 1948 the liberal integrationist Harry Truman carried AL because of the D after his!  I voted for "W" in 2004, Bush senior in 1992 and Reagan in 84.  I voted for Sen Isakson in 2004 and 2010 and will probably vote for him again this year.  I voted for Kemp and Olens for GA Sect'y of State and AG in 2014.  I did it because I considered them better, even if still unattractive, choices than their Democratic alternative.   When was the last time Lifer or Wixiepoo voted other than Republican candidate for any office regardless of the qualifications of either the Republican or Democrat running for that office?