i believe the underlying reason for Sandra Fluke’s
testimony, and the reason why it is so important, is that we need health
insurance plans to have uniform minimum standards as part of US Health
Policy.Fluke believes, as i do, that
birth control should be available thru all policies... regardless of who the
employer is.Making birth control available reduces
health care costs and creates social/financial/healthcare outcomes that prove
to be good for everyone involved.if Conservatives want to oppose
nationalized health care & still control spiraling costs, then raising the
standards & increasing the efficiency of insurance corporations by creating
more uniform coverage is a pretty good idea.Otherwise, we will continue to build a patchwork system of insurance
policies that is nearly impossible for consumers to comprehend, the sheer
complexity of which continues to add to the upward momentum of costs.
Right now, administrative expenses account for about 50% of
every dollar we spent on healthcare…. That’s a LOT of capital that is drawn off
by corporations for organizational overhead… leaving only 50% available for
real services.
To me, it’s similar to mandating that insurance companies
can’t deny coverage to someone for a pre-existing condition or insuring the
portability of coverage.in order to reign in health care costs, we
really do need more uniformity in the health care insurance system because this
will keep national costs down.We
already have hundreds, thousands, of different policies creating an inefficient
system FAR worse than a single payer system could be.
When the Catholic Church comes into the marketplace and sets
up a corporation, they should do so under the same rules that any other
corporation has to follow….. with the possible exception of their favored tax
status.