Off-Topic: Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
(Carroll County Lake Specific)
1 messages
Updated 4/5/2013 11:16:05 AM
Lakes Online Forum
83,967 messages
Updated 9/20/2024 8:56:07 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Carroll County Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
phil
-
|
Subject:
|
Rachel Mitchell's conclusion
|
Date:
|
9/28/2018 12:03:42 PM
|
|
Because the majority member told them no to the FBI so they wanted Kavanaugh to go around him and demand one which is a bucket of chit anyway.
All I can say is I hope when/if the repukes are out of the majority that they stick it to them demonrats by their new set standards from now own. They will literally have to find saints for any and all offices, all congressional members who have a sexual anything in their background other then signed and noterized sexual consent form per encounter ( including married couples ) because a marriage certificate does not mean she lost her right to say no.
|
|