Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Don't get your hackles up Date:   1/13/2016 5:16:07 PM

I just call them the way I see them.  When they are accused of something and you provide an explanation that exonerates them how can that not reasonably be interpreted as a defense?  If it isn't then what exactly is the point?  And you have done so on more than one occasion.  Go and re-read what you typed and tell me if it was just a simple sharing of some piece of inside information or would any reasonable person see that and assume it was a possible defense.  Considering the juxtaposition of the comments it is quite reasonable to come to the conclusion I came to. 

Frankly, I just dont get why you are so defensive about this.  And I will restate my opinion, if these facts are applicable to Hillary she would have certainly used them instead of the lame excuses she and her minions have espoused.  As you said, she has all sorts of very smart advisors.  Were these facts applicable to her situation I am hard pressed to understand why they would give lame excuses when these put the entire matter to rest.  Considering they do not, I am of the opinion that they likely are not applicable and represent meaningless information.