Carroll County Lake Topics: Snakebit
(Carroll County Lake Specific)
1 messages
Updated 4/5/2013 11:16:05 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,091 messages
Updated 11/8/2024 10:28:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Carroll County Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Lakewood
-
|
Subject:
|
Snakebit
|
Date:
|
5/11/2009 2:13:07 PM
|
|
I'm having MAJOR second thoughts about the decision to administer (extremely expensive) antivenom to my dog. As a rule, I don't quibble with doctors, including vets, but next time I likely will. He said they "do better" if antivenom is administered. I did ask what he meant by "do better" and he said less return visits, less necrosis, less chance of infection. I said yes but am more than starting to wish I hadn't. Nothing I can find online, scientific or anecdotal, suggests it's hardly ever a good idea for single copperhead bites, for dogs or people.
I found out one reason copperheads aren't very lethal is they give a lot of "dry bites" in which no or little venom is actually administered. Of course, you don't really know for awhile.
I tell you one side effect of such a bite: for years I've walked carelessly around my yard at the Lake. This weekend (one week post-bite) I was creeping around and my eyes buggin out in ALL directions. Nerve-wracking.
Another thing I don't know: the efficacy and usefulness of antivenom obviously varies depending on how long since the bite. But no source I can find says "After an hour (or 3 hours or 12 hours), no need to bother." Our dog was bit on Sunday and we drove to an emergency vet in Mgm, which was 60-plus minutes away. I wonder if it was totally academic by then.
|
|