Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Which Sondman do you believe? Date:   11/20/2019 1:33:13 PM (updated 11/20/2019 2:13:51 PM)

The one that stated unequivocally that Trump told him no quid pro quo or the one that belatedly now assumes the investigation of Burisma was at the direction of Trump with zero evidence other than what he read in the papers?  So we have a veritable litany of witnesses that exonerate Trump, we have Sondland in his own words exonerating Trump and then we have Sondland throwing pretty much everyone under the bus based on his opinion.......sorry Archie, but one guy's belated opinion in the face of the actual words of the President himself to Sondland is where the truth lies.

And note that Sondman conveniently ommitted the crucial discussion with Trump from his opening statement.  When asked about why he left it out of his 23-page opening statement is that he "didn't have room for it".  This statement alone convinces me to believe the guy who relayed what the President told him......23 pages and he couldn't fit the actual words of the President but was able to fit in all his opinion and speculation about what the President was thinking......come on Dems, surely you can do better than this.  And this from a guy who admitted he did not take notes.