Name:   Buteye - Subject:   FBI/Dept of Justice Deals Date:   10/3/2016 9:14:05 PM (updated 10/3/2016 9:17:33 PM)

Deals just being uncovered between the FBI and the DOJ regarding Hillary's private servers and immunity being given Cheryl Mills are so blatant they are beyond comprehension. According to the latest information, the DOJ gave approval for the FBI to make "side deals " to destroy top Clinton Aides laptops and the private servers being used by Hillary. Also, FBI agents were required to sign a non-disclosure statement which according to anonoymous agents reports is almost never done unless a grand jury is impaneled. Further, what is even more peculiar about this case is that rhe "same woman"(Cher yl Mills), was: (1) a 'subject' of the probe, (2) a 'key witness' in the peobe, (3) a dubious "immunity recipient', and (4) a 'lawyer' to the primary subject-- who was allowed to sit in on her quasi-client's interview with investigators. And if that wasn't enough, the FBI agreed to permanently destroy two pieces of evidence after reviewing them. Even more infuriating is the fact that James Comey tolld Congress that there was no case for criminal charges against Mills. If that's the case, what did she need immunity for? And why would she want her laptop "nuked"? Meanwhile, former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy-- who calls himself "hard-wired" to defend the integrity of the FBI-- writes that investigators' treatment and accomodtion of Mills is so bizarre as to beggar belief. Her 'unheard-of' accomodation was made in violationm not only of rudimentary investigative protocols and attorney-ethics rules, but also of the federal "criminal" law. This whole ordeal has made a mockery of our judicial system and is so blatant that it defies imagination. Yet, the FBI and the Justice Department, the nations's chief enforcers of the federal criminal law, tell us they were powerless to object. To quote the words of another concerned citizen, "Just as Director Comey rightly objects to be regarded as a weasel, I don't much like being regarded as an idiot-- which is what I would have to be to swallow some of this stuff. There is much more to be said regarding this subject, but I hope this is enough to infuriate every person who stands for upholding the "law". If here is anyone who doesn't believe this type of nomsense originated in the White House, stand up and be counted.