Name:   architect - Subject:   New Gettysburg Address Date:   10/24/2016 1:22:17 PM

I draw the line at not electing people who are borderline crazy and obviously unstable, not whether they are politicians and therefore pretty much by definition prone to questionable dealings.  If Trump had been in politics for 30 years, based on his verifiable history in the private sector, I suspect his record would be far more in question than Clinton's.  Clinton is certainly prone to obfuscate and sugar coat her record, but there has not to date been any verifiable vidence that she did anything illegal...letting somebody sit at the head table in return for a contribution is neither illegal nor unethical if it does not go beyond that act.  as for ''Foundations'', I suspect the strongest Trump supporter would cringe at the thought of a comparison of the benefits to humanity of the Clinton and Trump equivalents...providing antiviral drugs to as many as 10% of the Aids patients in Africa is a bit more ambitious than buying a portrait of Donald Trump to put in one of his properties or giving money to the re-election campaign of an Attorney General who is considering an investigation of your ''University''!  The unaffiliated and independant group that rates charities say the Clinton Foundations use 90%+ of funds for aid to recepiants.  They do not even rate Trump's group because they do not considerate it a legit organization!

Vote for Trump if you think his stands are more in line with your politics, but do not try to polish a record and a personal character that is beyond redemption.