Off-Topic: Still waiting for a substantive reply
(Upper Red Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
84,091 messages
Updated 11/8/2024 10:28:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Upper Red Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Upper Red Lake Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   MartiniMan The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   Still waiting for a substantive reply
Date:   1/11/2016 3:36:41 PM

You asked me for an analysis of the 97% malarky.....I did.  You questioned my skepticism and I provided one very good study (believe me, there are plenty more) about why I am skeptical....not closed minded, just skeptical.  You are the one that is close minded and don't even remotely get the irony of you calling me that.  I am open to the idea that man-made CO2 has an impact on global climates.  You are not open to the idea that it doesn't.  

As for your silly comments about humiliation.....you do that to yourself.  I just provide facts, logic and reason and you do all the heavy lifting.  Honestly Archie, it would be a huge step forward for you to admit that maybe there is more work to be done on this issue before we do anything drastic.  But your pride would never let you agree with me and that is sad indeed.  And even more sad is you don't see the irony of accusing me of thinking I am the smartest person in the room.  Open your mind, stop relying on nonsensical, discreditied polls and think for just once.  It will be liberating everywhere but in conversations with fellow left wing nuts that will think you have lost your mind if you state that you are not convinced about ACC........I'll be willing to bet money they sneer at you and say, "Well, I'll take the opinion of 97% of scientists rather than some dumb architect."  Give it a shot and see if I'm not right.  Then if you have real courage you could say, "I can't understand how you are basing your beliefs on a discredited poll" and watch them really go ballistic.  Be advised, you will not be invited to their cocktail party again.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
Science versus polls - MartiniMan - 1/6/2016 1:07:37 PM
     Love the silence from globaloney alarmists - MartiniMan - 1/10/2016 9:14:02 AM
          [Message deleted by author] - architect - 1/10/2016 9:38:14 AM
          why waste our time - architect - 1/10/2016 9:41:17 AM
               How about just one? - MartiniMan - 1/10/2016 8:56:44 PM
     Here you go Archibald - MartiniMan - 1/10/2016 9:55:42 PM
          To be yet again be "humiliated" by MM! - architect - 1/11/2016 1:59:02 PM
               Still waiting for a substantive reply - MartiniMan - 1/11/2016 3:36:41 PM



Quick Links
Upper Red Lake News
Upper Red Lake Photos
Upper Red Lake Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
UpperRed.LakesOnline.com
THE UPPER RED LAKE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal