(Upper Red Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
84,091 messages
Updated 11/8/2024 10:28:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Upper Red Lake Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Yankee06
|
|
Subject:
|
MAGI? Archy
|
|
Date:
|
11/2/2009 8:49:43 PM
|
|
Archy,
-Reference your "MAGI" post above, ....now I'm really confused.
-I haven't been on this forum all that long, but up to this point, I kind of got the idea that you lean a little to the left, and are "OK" with taxing the upper middle and upper classes in order to insure economic fairness for those less fortunate.
-But in your MAGI post above, you wrote: "... I also would expect he is wise enough to shelter a lot of his income. ....I myself am thankful and amazed each year when I see how much less my MAGI is than what I actually make..."
-Hmmmm, am I understanding you to say that you are "OK" with taxing the wealthy, ..and that you are "OK" with weath transfer, .....but only as believed by the Geitner-Daschle school of economics which apparently says that it is only "OK" to excessively tax conservatives, who, paradoxically, don't believe in excessive taxes; ..but it is "NOT OK" to excessively tax liberals, who, paradoxically, "DO" believe in excessive taxation.
- h-m-m-m-m-m--mmmmmmmmm, do you see how I might be confused?
|
|
Reply
Back
Search
Off-Topic Forum
»
Minnesota Lakes
»
Upper Red Lake
Login
|
Home
