Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Sigh...... Date:   7/10/2019 3:04:01 PM (updated 7/10/2019 3:25:37 PM)

Really, you have to use a little critical thought before you blindly post these things.  These are adjusted numbers and have already been debunked.  They completely removed the satellite data from the analysis because they did not show appreciable warming.  These were the very same satellites we were told by NOAA would eliminate land-based interference from heat sinks and other sources. In addition, I suggest you look at the adjustments made by NOAA to the USHCN data set since 1900.  All of the adjustments up to around 2002 were negative (i.e., cooler than measured) and all the adjustments since 2002 were positive (i.e., warmer than measured).  And the total adjustments since 1900 are 1.5 degC which amazingly is exactly how much warming NOAA claims to have occurred in the last century.  If you remove their amazingly coincidental 1.5 degC adjustments there has been exactly zero warming over the last century.

I would also note that the IPCC in 2013 noted the following:  "the rate of warming over the past 15 years … is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951." and IPCC "concluded that the global surface temperature 'has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years [1998-2012] than over the past 30 to 60 years.'"  This result was refuted by a study by NOAA that a whistleblower claimed was based on fraudulent and manipulated data, data which was somehow lost when a computer died.

I know you slavishly believe anything from the government but I work with NOAA all the time.  They are not the best and brightest and they are politically motivated and have been caught several times fudging the numbers to get the result they want.  Do some research and stop wasting our time with faulty reports.  Sheesh.....