Grilling & Recipes: St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
(Lake Pamona Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
84,162 messages
Updated 12/24/2024 2:22:12 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Pamona Specific)
0 messages
Updated
Lakes Online Forum
4,173 messages
Updated 12/20/2024 5:31:50 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Pamona Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Tall Cotton The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
Date:   6/14/2017 9:06:39 AM

I don't do ribs as often as I would like, but when I do, they are baby backs. There's just something about the St Louis style and them not being as uniform in shape. Also, you tend to get more gristle in the St Louis. I think you're correct about the amount of meat between bones. Since the St Louis are from farther down the ribs have spread a little. Either way, cooked properly they are both a tasty meal!

So do you remove the membrane from the back, or leave it on? If you remove it, what method do you use?

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Mack - 6/12/2017 8:04:06 PM
     St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Tall Cotton - 6/14/2017 9:06:39 AM
          Membrane - Mack - 6/14/2017 5:35:16 PM
               Membrane - Tall Cotton - 6/15/2017 10:06:26 AM
                    Membrane - Mack - 6/15/2017 11:53:44 AM
                         Membrane - Little Talisi - 6/16/2017 11:26:26 AM
                              Membrane - Mack - 6/17/2017 9:50:33 AM



Quick Links
Lake Pamona News
Lake Pamona Photos
Lake Pamona Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Pamona.LakesOnline.com
THE LAKE PAMONA WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal