(Lake Okeechobee Specific)
4 messages
Updated 11/25/2019 4:36:36 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,070 messages
Updated 10/30/2024 8:48:25 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Okeechobee Specific)
2 messages
Updated 4/9/2020 8:42:00 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Webmaster
-
|
Subject:
|
I don't know about that.
|
Date:
|
9/10/2008 8:34:46 PM
|
|
No, I haven't received a letter. That post was made on this forum back in July and I removed it as soon as I checked out a few things. That kind of allegation has no place on a bread and butter site such as this. If the poster felt his/her allegations could be proven, were in the public interest or had evidence to contribute, it should be brought to the attention of proper authorities first, not on a public forum. The proper authority in this case would likely be the Alabama State Fire Marshal or the Elmore County District Attorney. The part of the post that implicates a crime is groundless criticism that RL has a right to retaliate against.
In my case, the poster did not have a name or telephone number on file in my database, nor did they come forward to me with information of how to further substantiate allegations that a crime had been committed... That would make it the least bit newsworthy. So how could I possibly take it seriously?
Then, I discussed the post with a friend of mine who is a District Court Judge. That particular post could be considered slander per se...Categories are as follows:
(i) Accusing someone of a crime (ii) Alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease (iii) Adversely reflecting on a person’s fitness to conduct her business or trade (iv) Imputing serious sexual misconduct (especially the chastity of a woman)
Regardless, that kind of content is best for sites like SLM. Notice the difference between their site and mine is you can pick up a phone and call me from a published number, but they don't want you to know who is behind that site... I can't blame them considering the content and what I believe their agenda to be. As the saying goes, “To each his own”.
I'm in the advertising business and work to help businesses prosper. That's my job! I don't want my lake sites to be known as the epitome of controversy for causes which are not my own. I don’t really appreciate people using my assets (forum or otherwise) to further their agenda at my expense or at the expense of the people I’m working to help.
I look at it this way… If I had let the post remain, then I would have been looked upon as I was in agreement with it. Not my intent… I would probably have a similar letter now... Either way, I lose being criticized by someone.
I’ve said enough and will comment no further on this topic. Have a good evening folks.
BP
|
| TIT IN A WRINGER - HOTROD - 9/10/2008 3:22:22 PM | TIT IN A WRINGER - SPEARFISHER - 9/10/2008 4:12:46 PM | Very Strange - water_watcher - 9/10/2008 4:14:19 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Blue Creeker - 9/10/2008 10:32:01 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/10/2008 11:46:55 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 7:14:20 AM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 8:08:56 AM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 10:19:46 AM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 10:28:27 AM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 11:32:19 AM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - BayPineYankee - 9/11/2008 12:42:22 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/11/2008 1:17:13 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/11/2008 1:18:14 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 2:06:57 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 2:10:20 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - BayPineYankee - 9/11/2008 3:04:16 PM | Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 6:57:29 PM | weight-watcher ub a lawyer? - Pontoon - 9/11/2008 10:15:56 PM | I don't know about that. - jalcz - 9/10/2008 4:38:19 PM | I don't know about that. - SPEARFISHER - 9/10/2008 4:41:51 PM | I don't know about that. - jalcz - 9/10/2008 5:21:40 PM | I don't know about that. - head - 9/10/2008 5:48:27 PM | I don't know about that. - Webmaster - 9/10/2008 8:34:46 PM | I don't know about that. - CAT BOAT - 9/10/2008 11:10:25 PM | |