Lake Okeechobee Topics: I don't know about that.
(Lake Okeechobee Specific)
4 messages
Updated 11/25/2019 4:36:36 PM
Lakes Online Forum
84,070 messages
Updated 10/30/2024 8:48:25 AM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
(Lake Okeechobee Specific)
2 messages
Updated 4/9/2020 8:42:00 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,172 messages
Updated 9/9/2024 5:04:44 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,261 messages
Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
Lake Okeechobee Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Webmaster The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   I don't know about that.
Date:   9/10/2008 8:34:46 PM

No, I haven't received a letter. That post was made on this forum back in July and I removed it as soon as I checked out a few things. That kind of allegation has no place on a bread and butter site such as this. If the poster felt his/her allegations could be proven, were in the public interest or had evidence to contribute, it should be brought to the attention of proper authorities first, not on a public forum. The proper authority in this case would likely be the Alabama State Fire Marshal or the Elmore County District Attorney. The part of the post that implicates a crime is groundless criticism that RL has a right to retaliate against.

In my case, the poster did not have a name or telephone number on file in my database, nor did they come forward to me with information of how to further substantiate allegations that a crime had been committed... That would make it the least bit newsworthy. So how could I possibly take it seriously?

Then, I discussed the post with a friend of mine who is a District Court Judge. That particular post could be considered slander per se...Categories are as follows:

(i) Accusing someone of a crime
(ii) Alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease
(iii) Adversely reflecting on a person’s fitness to conduct her business or trade
(iv) Imputing serious sexual misconduct (especially the chastity of a woman)

Regardless, that kind of content is best for sites like SLM. Notice the difference between their site and mine is you can pick up a phone and call me from a published number, but they don't want you to know who is behind that site... I can't blame them considering the content and what I believe their agenda to be. As the saying goes, “To each his own”.

I'm in the advertising business and work to help businesses prosper. That's my job! I don't want my lake sites to be known as the epitome of controversy for causes which are not my own. I don’t really appreciate people using my assets (forum or otherwise) to further their agenda at my expense or at the expense of the people I’m working to help.

I look at it this way… If I had let the post remain, then I would have been looked upon as I was in agreement with it. Not my intent… I would probably have a similar letter now... Either way, I lose being criticized by someone.

I’ve said enough and will comment no further on this topic. Have a good evening folks.

BP
Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
TIT IN A WRINGER - HOTROD - 9/10/2008 3:22:22 PM
      TIT IN A WRINGER - SPEARFISHER - 9/10/2008 4:12:46 PM
     Very Strange - water_watcher - 9/10/2008 4:14:19 PM
          Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Blue Creeker - 9/10/2008 10:32:01 PM
               Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/10/2008 11:46:55 PM
                    Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 7:14:20 AM
                         Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 8:08:56 AM
                              Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 10:19:46 AM
                                   Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 10:28:27 AM
                                        Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 11:32:19 AM
                                             Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - BayPineYankee - 9/11/2008 12:42:22 PM
                                             Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/11/2008 1:17:13 PM
                                                  Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - UncleSam - 9/11/2008 1:18:14 PM
                                                       Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 2:06:57 PM
                                             Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - Kizma Anuice - 9/11/2008 2:10:20 PM
                                                  Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - BayPineYankee - 9/11/2008 3:04:16 PM
                                                       Ummm, the 1st Amendment has... - water_watcher - 9/11/2008 6:57:29 PM
                                             weight-watcher ub a lawyer? - Pontoon - 9/11/2008 10:15:56 PM
     I don't know about that. - jalcz - 9/10/2008 4:38:19 PM
          I don't know about that. - SPEARFISHER - 9/10/2008 4:41:51 PM
               I don't know about that. - jalcz - 9/10/2008 5:21:40 PM
                    I don't know about that. - head - 9/10/2008 5:48:27 PM
          I don't know about that. - Webmaster - 9/10/2008 8:34:46 PM
               I don't know about that. - CAT BOAT - 9/10/2008 11:10:25 PM



Quick Links
Lake Okeechobee News
Lake Okeechobee Photos
Lake Okeechobee Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
Okeechobee.USLakes.info
THE LAKE OKEECHOBEE WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, Lakes Online
Privacy    |    Legal