Grilling & Recipes: St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
(AntiqueTrail.com Specific)
7 messages
Updated 8/6/2020 4:44:02 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,160 messages
Updated 12/19/2024 10:19:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,173 messages
Updated 12/20/2024 5:31:50 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
(AntiqueTrail.com Specific)
1 messages
Updated 3/26/2014 1:00:30 PM
AntiqueTrail.com Photo Gallery





    
Welcome, Guest Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]
Name:   Mack The author of this post is registered as a member - Email Member
Subject:   St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
Date:   6/12/2017 8:04:06 PM

One more time, just to jingle this dead forum. Come on folks!!! It is Summer and time to Burn Some Meat!!

Competition cookers use STL ribs often. I think I prefer Baby Backs because of the amount of loin meat they normally have. But, the STL have more meat between the bones?? And they smoke more quickly. Both are priced about the same and are generally available.

Which and why?? Smoke Eaters Need to know these things, ya'll.

Other messages in this thread:View Entire Thread
St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Mack - 6/12/2017 8:04:06 PM
     St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs?? - Tall Cotton - 6/14/2017 9:06:39 AM
          Membrane - Mack - 6/14/2017 5:35:16 PM
               Membrane - Tall Cotton - 6/15/2017 10:06:26 AM
                    Membrane - Mack - 6/15/2017 11:53:44 AM
                         Membrane - Little Talisi - 6/16/2017 11:26:26 AM
                              Membrane - Mack - 6/17/2017 9:50:33 AM



Quick Links
AntiqueTrail.com News
AntiqueTrail.com Photos
AntiqueTrail.com Videos




About Us
Contact Us
Site Map
Search Site
Advertise With Us
   
www.AntiqueTrail.com
THE ANTIQUETRAIL.COM WEBSITE

Copyright 2024, AntiqueTrail.com
Privacy    |    Legal