Grilling & Recipes: St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
(AntiqueTrail.com Specific)
7 messages
Updated 8/6/2020 4:44:02 AM
Lakes Online Forum
84,160 messages
Updated 12/19/2024 10:19:46 PM
Lakes Online Forum
5,204 messages
Updated 9/14/2024 10:10:50 AM
Lakes Online Forum
4,173 messages
Updated 12/20/2024 5:31:50 PM
Lakes Online Forum
4,262 messages
Updated 11/6/2024 6:43:09 PM
Lakes Online Forum
2,979 messages
Updated 6/26/2024 5:03:03 AM
Lakes Online Forum
98 messages
Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM
(AntiqueTrail.com Specific)
1 messages
Updated 3/26/2014 1:00:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Mack
-
|
Subject:
|
St. Louis Cut vs. Baby Back ribs??
|
Date:
|
6/12/2017 8:04:06 PM
|
|
One more time, just to jingle this dead forum. Come on folks!!! It is Summer and time to Burn Some Meat!!
Competition cookers use STL ribs often. I think I prefer Baby Backs because of the amount of loin meat they normally have. But, the STL have more meat between the bones?? And they smoke more quickly. Both are priced about the same and are generally available.
Which and why?? Smoke Eaters Need to know these things, ya'll.
|
|