Name:   MrHodja - Subject:   Just read SB's nonsense on this string!! Date:   8/8/2015 6:16:38 PM

As an architect I respect your explanation.  I wondered why it pancaked inward the way it did, rather than outward as you would expect from a building with a significant concrete encased steel inner support system.  

SB's doubt about the Pentagon is also half baked.  If one looks at Google Earth one will see that the approach path to the strike point is over a significant portion of Arlington National Cemetary.  I doubt that the residents of that hallowed facility would see much of anything.  And his expecting there to be truckloads of aluminum debris from the plane ignores the physics of aluminum and a JP-4 fueled inferno.  The entire plane would be melted and most likely vaporized.  And as to the plane being higher than the hole, the gear was most likely not deployed, and the only part of the plane that would be taller than the hole would be the vertical stabilizer, which is mostly air with some aluminum skin and reinforcing spars.  It would have been no match for a concrete and brick wall.

SB probably believed in Nostradamus' prediction that the world would end about 15 or 20 years ago.  That didn't happen, nor the end of the Mayan calendar and on and on and on with the stuff conspiracy theorists thrive on.